www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: Re: Re: Infringement?


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on April 02, 2001 at 13:37:55:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Infringement? posted by Stephen L. Anderson on April 02, 2001 at 12:57:05:

: : : I believe I have infringed on an existing service mark. Loreal company has a service mark on the word skinlogics. It was for products for facial scrubs, and toners. My service mark was for my skincare facility which provided skincare services. The name I chose was not a plural but skinlogic. I have no claim to the word skin. Do I have any rights to pursue this?

: : Dear Scott,

: : From what you say, it looks terrible. To be certain one must be able to carefully consider law and facts.

: : If you are in trouble as it seems the longer you wait the more difficult it is. The next step is to prepare facts and law so this won't reoccur.

: : We make a living helping people like you.

: : M. Arthur Auslander
: : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
: : 505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
: : 212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
: : ELAINE's Workshop (sm)
: : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive

: ------
: Trademarks are usually limited to the goods and or services by which they are registered. Different trademark classes of goods and services exist for different products and services - therefore it is indeed possible for two different traders to use the same mark under certain circumstances.

: For example, DELTA for airlines and DELTA for faucets.

: The plain test of infringement is whether the consumers are being misled about the source and origin of your goods and services. If your use of a substantially similar name is likely to confuse the public, then it is likely an infringement.

: Because the goods as registered by Loreal in this case (skin care products) are reasonably related to the services that you offer, consumer confusion is possible, if not likely.

: Further consideration should be made into the nature of Loreal's mark, namely whether "Skinlogics" is limited to any particular design (a design mark as opposed to a word mark) and/or whether any disclaimers against Loreal's exclusive claims as registered.

: For more information, please visit our websites:

: www.BrandXperts.com or
: www.namesavers.net or
: www.copyrightpros.com

: Anderson & Shippey - Intellectual Property Solutions for the New Millennium.

: Offices in Irvine and San Francisco, California
: tel. (949) 754-3048

For patent, trademarks, copyrights or Intellectual Property lawyering you can trust for quality and price, call:

M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop (sm)
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive





Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Infringement?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Trademark Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.



Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Trademark Forum
www.intelproplaw.com