www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: Re: Infringement?


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Stephen L. Anderson on April 02, 2001 at 12:57:05:

In Reply to: Re: Infringement? posted by M. Arthur Auslander on March 27, 2001 at 04:55:53:

: : I believe I have infringed on an existing service mark. Loreal company has a service mark on the word skinlogics. It was for products for facial scrubs, and toners. My service mark was for my skincare facility which provided skincare services. The name I chose was not a plural but skinlogic. I have no claim to the word skin. Do I have any rights to pursue this?

: Dear Scott,

: From what you say, it looks terrible. To be certain one must be able to carefully consider law and facts.

: If you are in trouble as it seems the longer you wait the more difficult it is. The next step is to prepare facts and law so this won't reoccur.

: We make a living helping people like you.

: M. Arthur Auslander
: Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
: 505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
: 212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
: ELAINE's Workshop (sm)
: E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive

------
Trademarks are usually limited to the goods and or services by which they are registered. Different trademark classes of goods and services exist for different products and services - therefore it is indeed possible for two different traders to use the same mark under certain circumstances.

For example, DELTA for airlines and DELTA for faucets.

The plain test of infringement is whether the consumers are being misled about the source and origin of your goods and services. If your use of a substantially similar name is likely to confuse the public, then it is likely an infringement.

Because the goods as registered by Loreal in this case (skin care products) are reasonably related to the services that you offer, consumer confusion is possible, if not likely.

Further consideration should be made into the nature of Loreal's mark, namely whether "Skinlogics" is limited to any particular design (a design mark as opposed to a word mark) and/or whether any disclaimers against Loreal's exclusive claims as registered.

For more information, please visit our websites:

www.BrandXperts.com or
www.namesavers.net or
www.copyrightpros.com

Anderson & Shippey - Intellectual Property Solutions for the New Millennium.

Offices in Irvine and San Francisco, California
tel. (949) 754-3048



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Infringement?

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Trademark Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.



Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Trademark Forum
www.intelproplaw.com