www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
|
Re: Re: Infringement?[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by Stephen L. Anderson on April 02, 2001 at 12:57:05: In Reply to: Re: Infringement? posted by M. Arthur Auslander on March 27, 2001 at 04:55:53: : : I believe I have infringed on an existing service mark. Loreal company has a service mark on the word skinlogics. It was for products for facial scrubs, and toners. My service mark was for my skincare facility which provided skincare services. The name I chose was not a plural but skinlogic. I have no claim to the word skin. Do I have any rights to pursue this? : Dear Scott, : From what you say, it looks terrible. To be certain one must be able to carefully consider law and facts. : If you are in trouble as it seems the longer you wait the more difficult it is. The next step is to prepare facts and law so this won't reoccur. : We make a living helping people like you. : M. Arthur Auslander ------ For example, DELTA for airlines and DELTA for faucets. The plain test of infringement is whether the consumers are being misled about the source and origin of your goods and services. If your use of a substantially similar name is likely to confuse the public, then it is likely an infringement. Because the goods as registered by Loreal in this case (skin care products) are reasonably related to the services that you offer, consumer confusion is possible, if not likely. Further consideration should be made into the nature of Loreal's mark, namely whether "Skinlogics" is limited to any particular design (a design mark as opposed to a word mark) and/or whether any disclaimers against Loreal's exclusive claims as registered. For more information, please visit our websites: www.BrandXperts.com or Anderson & Shippey - Intellectual Property Solutions for the New Millennium. Offices in Irvine and San Francisco, California
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Trademark Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |