Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why knock prior

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why knock prior

Comments:
: : I was attempting to answer her question. If she wants to file a useless patent, that's her choice. I would assume that people would talk with an attorney before wasting money. : : : : : : I would imagine its customary because you have to get around the prior art to get the patent, so you need to show how much different yourDeasr invention is. : Dear : Sprink, : DISTINGUISHING prior art over the disclosure of a patent application may get you a patent. JUST getting a patent may be a great waste of money if others can achieve the same result without infringing your patent. : That is why we have the Reality Check®, to save time money and worry. : M. Arthur Auslander : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463 : 7185430266, aus@auslander.com : ELAINE's Workshop® : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™ : Reality Check® : : : : : : : : : I mean when the patent application talks about prior art, and how the new proposed invention is better than previous related patents inventions. : : : Dear Sprink, : : : Are you enouraging inventors to just file get worthless patents. The whole idea of the Reality Check® is to save inventors time money and worry. : : : M. Arthur Auslander : : : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : : : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463 : : : 7185430266, aus@auslander.com : : : ELAINE's Workshop® : : : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™ : : : Reality Check®

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.