Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why knock prior
[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ] [ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]
Posted by Sprink on April 06, 2003 at 23:42:12:
In Reply to: Re: Re: Re: Re: Why knock prior posted by M. Arthur Auslander on April 06, 2003 at 06:38:38:
I was attempting to answer her question. If she wants to file a useless patent, that's her choice. I would assume that people would talk with an attorney before wasting money. : : I would imagine its customary because you have to get around the prior art to get the patent, so you need to show how much different yourDeasr invention is.
: : : : : I mean when the patent application talks about prior art, and how the new proposed invention is better than previous related patents inventions. : Dear Sprink, : Are you enouraging inventors to just file get worthless patents. The whole idea of the Reality Check® is to save inventors time money and worry. : M. Arthur Auslander : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463 : 7185430266, aus@auslander.com : ELAINE's Workshop® : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™ : Reality Check®
Follow Ups:
Post a Followup
|