www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
Re: novelty/unobvious[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by in the know on March 03, 2003 at 12:39:42: In Reply to: novelty/unobvious posted by Williamy on March 03, 2003 at 04:23:30: THis is obviousness: you have glasses having lenses made of non-impact proof plastic. Such lenses are known to be prone to shattering. An obviousness teaching: OK, you have glass with the problem of shattering easily. Since a teaching is supplied that solves the problem of shattering lenses, having modified the lenses would have been obvious. Does this make sense?
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Patent Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |