Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We are looking for moderators.  Message the admin if interested.

Author Topic: Wouldja Rather? (Take off on "Patent 10M" discussion)  (Read 266 times)

Tobmapsatonmi

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
    • View Profile

So, would you rather have:

USP-10,000,000 or

USP-9,999,999 ?

I think the Nines Patent is cooler.

 
Logged

MYK

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4177
    • View Profile
Re: Wouldja Rather? (Take off on "Patent 10M" discussion)
« Reply #1 on: 06-14-18 at 02:35 am »

I'd rather get U.S. Patent #1 for my time machine.
Logged
"The life of a patent solicitor has always been a hard one."  Judge Giles Rich, Application of Ruschig, 379 F.2d 990.

Disclaimer: not only am I not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer.  Therefore, this does not constitute legal advice.

Robert K S

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1916
    • View Profile
Re: Wouldja Rather? (Take off on "Patent 10M" discussion)
« Reply #2 on: 06-14-18 at 09:27 am »

I'd rather get U.S. Patent #1 for my time machine.

The fact that you were able to get the patent means your patent is invalid as not enabling.
Logged
This post is made in the context of professional discussion of general patent law issues and nothing contained herein may be construed as legal advice.

Tabo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 113
    • View Profile
Re: Wouldja Rather? (Take off on "Patent 10M" discussion)
« Reply #3 on: 06-14-18 at 10:03 am »

You guys are making fun of it, but I am actually almost finished with a time machine - I just need two more parts: the miniature fusion reactor and the flux capacitor. I can't seem to find a supplier at a reasonable price.
Logged
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.168 seconds with 20 queries.