Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

We are looking for moderators.  Message the admin if interested.

Pages: 1 [2]

Author Topic: Fastener for garments  (Read 976 times)

Pianist

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Fastener for garments
« Reply #15 on: 08-09-17 at 02:43 pm »

Let me ask one question more.
What is the difference between "Fastener for garments" in title and in claims?
What limitations I have if I write "Fastener for garments" instead just "Fastener"?
Logged

lazyexaminer

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 189
    • View Profile
Re: Fastener for garments
« Reply #16 on: 08-09-17 at 03:09 pm »

I don't want to be a snob either, and I appreciate pro se inventors wanting to do it themselves.

But if you are asking the difference between the title and claims you know so little about patents that you are not going to get a worthwhile patent. You need to do way more basic research than just asking one off questions on a forum. Or you need to hire someone to explain things to you.
Logged
I'm not your examiner, I'm not your lawyer, and I'm speaking only for myself, not for the USPTO.

Pianist

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 16
    • View Profile
Re: Fastener for garments
« Reply #17 on: 08-09-17 at 03:53 pm »

I know difference between Title and Claims.
Claims is what I really want to protect with patent. So if I write Claim "Fastener for garments" and if someone use this fastener in shoe it isn't infringement? Or why should I write "Fastener for garments"?
Logged

MYK

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4002
    • View Profile
Re: Fastener for garments
« Reply #18 on: 08-09-17 at 05:04 pm »

Do you mean the "preamble" rather than the "title"?  The preamble is sometimes limiting, sometimes not.

Regardless, if you think your fastener has general utility outside of garment-specific uses, why not just use "fastener"?  Then you don't have to worry about an infringer trying to convince a court that your patent doesn't cover the use of the fastener in, say, suitcases.
Logged
"The life of a patent solicitor has always been a hard one."  Judge Giles Rich, Application of Ruschig, 379 F.2d 990.

Disclaimer: not only am I not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer.  Therefore, this does not constitute legal advice.
Pages: 1 [2]
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.118 seconds with 20 queries.