Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

News:

We have updated the software.  Let us know if there are any issues.

Main Menu

Article "CIPs are Useless"

Started by khazzah, 11-04-14 at 08:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

khazzah

I found this paper on CIPs to be helpful.

http://www.valuablepatents.com/2005CIPsAreUseless.pdf

The link is to:

"CIP'S ARE USELESS"
BY LOUIS J. HOFFMAN
HOFFMAN PATENT FIRM
PHOENIX,ARIZONA
NAPP 2005 CONVENTION

The author does a good job of explaining why CIPs don't accomplish what most folks think they do.
Karen Hazzah
Patent Prosecution Blog
http://allthingspros.blogspot.com/

Information provided in this post is not legal advice and does not create any attorney-client relationship.

NJ Patent1

Karen: Tks.  Just got around to it.  The "miracle" of the CIP is perhaps just slightly less misunderstood than the "miracle" of the PPA.  Article did rekindle – in my mind at least – a long-ago thread on "embodiment"; a concept I personally have no problem with (i.e the "same invention", just a different un-claimed "embodiment", the Kennecot case cited).  Personally, I wouldn't use the neutral "continuing application" for a true DIV filed in the face of a RR.  I would want to expressly lay claim to the statutory prohibition.  I urge pro ses and neophytes read it. 



www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com