Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New registrations are now permitted.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - JSonnabend

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 228
211
Merely registering a business name does not grant any trademark right to that name, nor mitigate any element of trademark infringement.

That's a bit of an overstatement.  Registering a fictitious name likely shows use, and therefore may indicate common law rights.  Even absent use, the registration may be part of a larger set of circumstances supporting priority. 

- Jeff

212
Merely citing a case where the TTAB found acquired distinctiveness is largely useless unless the facts of that case align with yours.  If you simply want to find registrations based on acquired distinctiveness, search TESS for 2(f) registrations.

- Jeff

213
Trademark Forum / Re: Product classification
« on: 04-19-11 at 06:59 am »
If the mark is not being used for goods, what is it being used for?  You're not an advertising agency, so the advertising ID is not appropriate.  Are you sure you have a mark?

- Jeff

214
Trademark Forum / Re: Opposition of trademark
« on: 04-19-11 at 06:58 am »
The opinion details what needs to be done and by when (it resets all the dates).  Next item up is the discovery conference by May 8.

- Jeff

215
Possibly.  You would need to explore the DuPont factors in more detail, including channels of trade and sophistication of consumers.

- Jeff

216
Trademark Forum / Re: Classes of G&S
« on: 04-12-11 at 07:55 am »
Product design services?  That's class 042.  Same for "engineering" and "engineering services."

- Jeff

217
Trademark Forum / Re: US Trademark infringement
« on: 04-12-11 at 07:53 am »
Ebay has legal contact information listed somewhere.  Search for "DMCA" in their legal documents as a start.  While the DMCA does not apply to trademark matters, it might point you in the right direction for a contact.  Also, in my experience, DMCA style letters on TM matters can be effective.

You should also contact the infringer directly if you are able to locate them.

Finally, you might consider using an attorney to handle this matter for you, as attorneys often get results where individuals acting on their own behalves cannot.

- Jeff

218
Why do you want to see the application?  The point was simply to show a relevant composite with a strong wordmark component.

- Jeff

219
That's a tricky point, one which leads to extended conversations with my clients.  In a nutshell, when budget is tight to the point of supporting only one registration, I analyze the client's use of the composite to assess the value of the composite vs. the wordmark alone.  As part of that analysis, I look at how prominent the wordmark is in the composite.  Ultimately, there is no easy answer (other than find the money to register both forms).

- Jeff

220
I think YAK has missed the thrust of the question.  If you use the elements in the manner you describe (i.e., with the wordmark and the logo above it), then you may seek to register that combination in a single application.  Bear in mind that the registration would be for the combination, not for the elements of the combination per se.

By way of example, see this registration.

- Jeff

221
Trademark Forum / Re: 2D and 3D Question - Part two! :o)
« on: 03-24-11 at 07:37 am »
Craigster, before you go planning your retirement on the profits your licensing plan is going to reap, be advised of the following.  While you can protect the artwork of your logo via copyright, copyright does not protect short phrases.  Therefore, your "message" is not protectable beyond the artwork of your actual logo.  In other words, you won't be able to stop anyone from using your special "message".

Good luck to you, though.  Please do report back when you've licensed your first licensee.

- Jeff

222
Trademark Forum / Re: 2D and 3D Question - Part two! :o)
« on: 03-23-11 at 12:04 pm »
The use of phrases and/or logos on clothing items presents a difficult situation.  In some instances, the use of phrases and/or logos are merely "ornamental" and therefore do not function as trademarks.  In other instances, it can be shown that the phrase and/or logo acts as a trademark and is protectable as such.

- Jeff

223
Trademark Forum / Re: Common Law Trademark Litigation
« on: 03-22-11 at 01:19 pm »
You have a federal cause of action under 43(a), but do you have a case?  If your client's geographic use did not extend to Florida prior to that party's first use, you may not have senior rights in Florida.

- Jeff

224
I may have removed a thread by mistake.  I do not recall the thread in question, so I can't say for sure.  You can always repost the question, of course.

By the way, if you are using the forum as some sort of means of disclosure of purported inventions, you are misusing the forums, in my view.

- Jeff

225
Copyright Forum / Re: Copyright Trolling
« on: 03-22-11 at 07:30 am »
When you say "downstream users", do you mean infringers?

- Jeff

Pages: 1 ... 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 ... 228


Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.125 seconds with 22 queries.