Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New registrations are now permitted.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - SoftmasterG

Pages: [1]
1
Trademark Forum / Question about "note to the file"
« on: 06-15-11 at 04:03 pm »
Quote
Under the new standard for granting a pre-publication letter of protest, the examining attorney is not required to issue a refusal as a result of the grant. The examining attorney is required only to consider the evidence and make an independent determination whether to issue the requirement or refusal requested in the letter of protest. The examining attorney need not inform the applicant that a letter of protest was granted unless he or she is issuing a refusal based upon the information provided with the letter of protest. The prosecution history of the application will reflect the grant of a letter of protest and a memorandum granting the protest and all relevant evidence will become part of the official record. If the examiner decides against issuing the requirement or refusal, a note to the file should be entered indicating that the evidence was reviewed.

I submitted a letter of protest based on likelihood of confusion with a pending application that I have.  That letter of protest was accepted and the examiner added a note to the file indicating "Protest evidence reviewed".  Does this mean that the examiner decided against issuing a requirement or refusal?  The letter of protested was granted for likelihood of confusion prior to the application going to publication and the application hasn't gone to publication yet.

2
Trademark Forum / Re: iThing - descriptive or suggestive?
« on: 05-06-11 at 05:32 am »
An iPhone App is not an Internet Application.  Look into the trademark application for iBook or iBooks to see arguments that Apple has made concerning merely descriptive.

3
Don't do anything.  If the application has published, then it's on its way and the letter of protest is irrelevant.

- Jeff

It turns out that the original USTPO attorney regained control of the case and issued a letter of rejection because of "Merely Descriptive", I have to respond within 6 months but was wondering if the rejection letter stops the clock on the 30 day period others have to oppose.

4
My trademark has been published for oppostiion, however prior to that happening the attorney for a company with a competing product using a similiar name sent in a letter of protest prior to publication attempting to make the case that my mark was merely descriptive and provided as evidence a series of web screen shots from google searches and on line forums.  The attorney for the competing product has filed for a trademark for a mark similiar to mine, let's say my trademark is "iSomething" they are filing for a trademark "MyCompanyName Something".  The letter of protest was claiming that "something" was merely descriptive.  I would like to add to the public record that the attorney issue the letter of protest is applying for a trademark for a term that they are claiming is merely descriptive.

5
Trademark Forum / Trademark question about iPhone App
« on: 12-11-10 at 12:44 am »
I created an iPhone app called "iSomeProductName" and it became available for sale in the iTunes App Store, two days later a product called "SomeProductName" became available for sale in the iTunes App Store and it's a competing product meaning it provides the same functionality.  I have filed a trademark application for the "iSomeProductName" and have contacted iTunes about the other app.  What rights do I have in this scenario?

Pages: [1]


Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 1.798 seconds with 22 queries.