Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

New registrations are now permitted.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - petethebody

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14]
196
Becoming a Patent Agent/Lawyer / Re: Working for the USPTO
« on: 05-24-09 at 02:00 pm »
Does anyone know when the hiring freeze is scheduled to be over.  I recall reading on here that the PTO might be taking resumes as early as Sept.  Can anyone verify that?

197
Here are some sources about employment trends for recent grads, starting salary info as well as general concerns about the legal field.  As you can see from my previous posts, I am somewhat cautious about entering the legal field.  As a soon-to-be graduate, I hope you sincerely look at this and contemplate the risks involved, before you move ahead.  I'm not saying don't do it, just be conscious of how things are going.

Employment Trends for Law School Grads, NAT’L L.J., Apr. 14, 2008, at 28, available at http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414employment_trends.pdf (giving the first ever detailed, independently researched statistics for post-law school employment for the top 100 schools with breakdowns by type of employment – the closest proxy to actual starting salaries).

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR LAW PLACEMENT, ANOTHER PICTURE IS WORTH 1000 WORDS, July 2008, http://www.nalp.org/content/index.php?pid=618 (showing the bimodal distribution for recent law grads: one peak representing biglaw, the other representing public interest, and a large gap inbetween)

Press Release, National Association for Law Placement, NALP Publishes New Report on Salaries for Public Sector and Public Interest Attorneys, Sept. 18, 2008, http://abajournal.com/files/NALP_Press_Release.pdf (mean entry level salary $40,000 in 2008);

Jason M. Dolin, Opportunity Lost: How Law Schools Disappoint Law Students, The Public, and the Legal Profession, 3 (2007) (unpublished paper) http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1000&context=jason_dolin (explaining how the current glut of lawyers has been “fostered and even encouraged by the ABA and by law schools.”);

Julie Kay, Moonlighting Lawyers Tackle Their School Debt, NAT’L L.J., Sept. 25, 2008, http://www.law.com/jsp/law/careercenter/lawArticleCareerCenter.jsp?id=1202424764260. (anecdotal story about a tier 2 grad struggling in Chicago)

Above the law.  www.abovethelaw.com (looking at recent layoffs and salary issues in the legal market place).

198
Malpractice Insurance

I was talking to one of my adjunct professors who has been a solo patent law/IP law practitioner for a little more than a decade now about the topic of malpractice insurance. 

Apparently, malpractice for IP is one of the most expensive types of malpractice insurance.  For a starting solo, he said that it would cost somewhere between $500 and $1000 for someone without any experience.  For those of you who have been practicing for a while, that amount would be less since the premium decreases the longer you practice (without getting sued).  At $6,000 to $12,000 a year, that's a substantial overhead cost. 

A few questions about malpractice insurance: What are some insurance companies that you all shop from (ie how do you get a quote)?  Anyone gone "bareback"?  How does one manage that expense? 

199
Resources

Since I started this thread, I only think it's appropriate that I kick things off.  By way of caveat, I think it's important to share that I am not a solo practitioner, in fact I'm not even a lawyer.  I am a law student who is about to graduate.  But, I've had first hand experience with solo practitioners all my life: my father is a solo tax, probate and trust and estate lawyer.  He's worked out of the home for the last 20 years now.  Being in such close proximity to the practice of law with a solo for so many year has really shaded my experiences.  I hope in the following posts that I am able to share some valuable, interesting, or just amusing insight.

One of the first books that I read about going solo was from the ABA's Section of Law Practice Management entitled "Flying solo : a survival guide for the solo and small firm lawyer" edited by K. William Gibson (2005 ed.).  Although this 500 page read was time consuming, it really hammered home points about the necessity of a support network of other attorneys to cover your call, refer you work, etc. 

Another endless source of inspiration has been MyShingle.com.  Although it has more to do about the day to day management of a solo shop than the choice to go solo, it is filled with little tid bits of information that shows how manageable starting from scratch can be if you have the guts and dedication.


200
Hello All,

With all the doom and gloom of the economy, a lot of people either have been or are worried about losing their jobs.  Along those lines, I think it would be nice to start a thread about making that big decision to go solo. 

I was hoping this could be a place where people share resources: books, periodicals, seminars, or even blogs.  Maybe a positive story, or one that serves as a warning.  Anything from general advice to the nitty gritty.  For patent agents, patent attorneys, IP attorneys, or attorneys that do IP work.

Here are a few topics that I'd like to throw out there for discussion in no particular order:

Books, blogs and other informational resources,
    Making the decision,
    Finding your niche,
    Setup costs,
    Malpractice insurance,
    Incorporating,
    Advertising,
    Making it those first few months

I was hoping for this to be insightful for anyone whose ever wondered about what it takes to make it on their own.

Thanks for reading.  I hope you choose to share.

201
I'll be attending Cornell Law School in the Fall

You'll be fine.  Just focus on your first year courses.  That'll give you some modicum of an idea about whether you like litigation or not (although far from a complete idea).  Then, go work in public interest during the summer between 1L and 2L and see what you like and what you don't about practice.  Then when you come back in the fall of your second year, you can take patents.  That'll be about the same time you're interviewing for 2L OCI.  That'll give you as good of an idea as you can get.  Besides, there are a lot of ways you can hedge your post-graduation bets, if you are both lucky and savy: pick a bigger firm that does more than patent, change firms if you hate patent law, alter your courses, etc.

Alternatively, if you want to see what patent law is like - this summer study for the patent bar.  Do it liesurely or seriously, either will be a real benefit.  Check out freepatentbar and some other cites (just google patent bar outlines) for free outlines and see if you can handle the mundane nature of patent law.  While you won't know how to draft a patent application, that studying will show you a great deal of what prosecution is like: a lot of keeping track of dates and formalities. 

And again, relax amigo; from Cornell, you'll be fine so long as you study hard and hustle to get a job your 2L year.  Make sure you shop around your courses in law school - it's the last time you'll be able to pick an area of law where you won't have a billable hour requirement hanging over your head.

202
I passed a few months back.  Had my letter sent to me 2 weeks later.  Returned it within 1 week.  Had my name posted in the gazette 2 weeks after that. 
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/dcom/gcounsel/oed.htm
They didn't receive any letters by the Friday deadline listed in the Gazette, so the following monday after the deadline, I was a patent agent.

Just a little under 2 months from passing to getting your official registration.

203
He/she has a job.  They are just complaining because their start date was pushed back a couple months from Sept. to Dec.  It could be far worse.   ???

Saying I have a "job" is a misnomer.  I have an offer for at will employment that is terminable by either party at any time for no reason, provided it isn't a violation of some sort of race, gender or age discrimination.

My start date has been pushed back 1 year, not 3 months as you believe.  It's one of those "deferred start dates:" for more info go check out abovethelaw.  I expect to not have a job when that year comes.  Many of my 3L friends (something on the order of 10%) likewise expect their offers to be revoked.  And that's not for a lack of good grades or misconduct.  Just the probability of it all. 

But as far as job security, of course it could be far worse: I could have no offer whatsoever or God forbid I could have cancer.  Things can always be worse.  The OP asked the worth of a law school degree and I answered.  Unless he is in the top quarter of his class at either school, his prospects are somewhere from pretty shaky to abysmal for the next 4 or 5 years.  That's not to say forever.  But, at the same time, I'm honestly answering the OP the way I see it without any sugar coating.  It sucks out there right now having no experience and competing with 10% of the biglaw associates with anywhere from 1-6 years experience that have been fired in the last few months. 

As for the degree, it is a tech bachelors degree from a T10 engineering program.  Good grades (but not honors).  Not EE, Comp, or Bio; I don't want to say any more for fear of outing.

Tangential to that note note, I would like to add that I have not seen as much emphasis placed on the non-JD degree.  I thought it would be a hard and fast rule for technical degrees, but there are genuinely other considerations.  For higher end prosecution, or some of the bigger prosecution shops, absolutely.  For litigation, I've been surprised with how many attorneys have non-technical degrees.  At the end of the day, it's just the business model of the individual law firm you are applying to. 

204
I'm a 3L in the top 2% of a top 20 law school who just recently became a patent agent and I am starting to regret going to law school right now. 

The job market really sucks right now.  Every 3L  I have talked to (and I do literally mean every) that had a big firm (National Law Journal 250) job, including myself, has had their start date pushed back until December at the earliest.  Public interest work is becoming almost impossible to get because the people who would be doing big law jobs are taking those jobs - the ones that usually go to the bottom half of the class.  Hanging a shingle in patent litigation is wholly impractical simply by the nature of the beast - it requires a team and it requires experience.  Patent prosecution requires malpractice insurance.  You can't go straight to a mid sized firm without first going to a big firm, because smaller firms don't want to train you.  Plus, the government isn't hiring now, on top of it all. 

But the debt is growing even faster.  My loans are about: $110k (fortunately all federal and all for law school).  I think that I may have to move in back home for a year or so in order to make the monthly payments. 

Before the tyraid of entitlement comments come in: I know nothing was promised and, furthermore, this is not the end of the world.  But what I do think is that law school is not the way to go.  It's too costly because many schools have just been raising tuition as the first-year associate salaries increased.  Now that the economy has tanked, I think that even the most successful recent law school grads are having trouble justifying the huge cost

I think the real evil is that all people (including law school applicants) have a misconception about the return on investment of law school.  Most people see a lawyer and thin they are well off.  Why is that?  The public at large has little to no understanding of the legal system, and have an antiquated notion of lawyers as the wealthy.  Law schools practically lie about their placement and success rates.  Even if you are skeptical of that, in denial of that, or are just a champion of caveat emptor: in this economy, the historic data of law school starting salaries is meaningless. 

I know that I went to law school thinking that I would be able to be a little better off if I worked really hard, got good grades and had a little luck along the way.  Now is not the time to be a law school grad.  I'm thoroughly convinced that for the next few years, I'm going to really struggle just to make ends meat. 

Unless you have a phenomenal financial support network (spouse, family, trust fund), or a substantial scholarship, I really think that law school is not the way to go.  Maybe in a few years, but not right now.

To be brief: go to law school if you want to be a lawyer.  If you don't know what a lawyer does or have any idea if you will like it, I strongly recommend you take a year and go clerk in a firm, or for a court or something LEGAL.  I'll tell you right now: you will almost certainly not get a job at a firm between your 1L and 2L year even if you are in the top quarter in this economy.  And your first year of law school will tell you nothing about what it means to be a lawyer.  So you'll have no better understanding and you'll be a minimum of 20k in debt according to your hypo.

But, since no one ever listens to me anyway: if you're going to go - go to the state school rather than Georgetown.  Save some cash.  You won't become president, a senator, a law professor, or a federal judge if you go to the state school, but, from your description, none of those appear to be on the radar anyway.  Alternatively, if you do well, you can always transfer up.

205
I'm a 3L in the top 2% of a top 20 law school who just recently became a patent agent and I am starting to regret going to law school right now. 

The job market really sucks right now.  Every 3L  I have talked to (and I do literally mean every) that had a big firm (National Law Journal 250) job, including myself, has had their start date pushed back until December at the earliest.  Public interest work is becoming almost impossible to get because the people who would be doing big law jobs are taking those jobs - the ones that usually go to the bottom half of the class.  Hanging a shingle in patent litigation is wholly impractical simply by the nature of the beast - it requires a team and it requires experience.  Patent prosecution requires malpractice insurance.  You can't go straight to a mid sized firm without first going to a big firm, because smaller firms don't want to train you.  Plus, the government isn't hiring now, on top of it all. 

But the debt is growing even faster.  My loans are about: $110k (fortunately all federal and all for law school).  I think that I may have to move in back home for a year or so in order to make the monthly payments. 

Before the tyraid of entitlement comments come in: I know nothing was promised and, furthermore, this is not the end of the world.  But what I do think is that law school is not the way to go.  It's too costly because many schools have just been raising tuition as the first-year associate salaries increased.  Now that the economy has tanked, I think that even the most successful recent law school grads are having trouble justifying the huge cost

I think the real evil is that all people (including law school applicants) have a misconception about the return on investment of law school.  Most people see a lawyer and thin they are well off.  Why is that?  The public at large has little to no understanding of the legal system, and have an antiquated notion of lawyers as the wealthy.  Law schools practically lie about their placement and success rates.  Even if you are skeptical of that, in denial of that, or are just a champion of caveat emptor: in this economy, the historic data of law school starting salaries is meaningless. 

I know that I went to law school thinking that I would be able to be a little better off if I worked really hard, got good grades and had a little luck along the way.  Now is not the time to be a law school grad.  I'm thoroughly convinced that for the next few years, I'm going to really struggle just to make ends meat. 

Unless you have a phenomenal financial support network (spouse, family, trust fund), or a substantial scholarship, I really think that law school is not the way to go.  Maybe in a few years, but not right now.

206
Hi.  Long time lurker who passed the test last week wed.  Was definitely harder than I thought it was going to be.

Had about 8 or 9 questions on PCT: mostly, what if you enter the national stage without a translation right at the 30 mo deadline, what if you enter the national stage without a specific declaration that you want the app to be a national app claiming the benefit of the pct (what is your filing date, and is it a national app or a reg nonprov)

I had a bunch of questions on reissue (like 6)

A lot of questions on appeals (like 8): a lot on timing.  One on whether you can get extension of time to keep copendency after you file notice of appeal, but without filing an appellate brief.  Question as to what (in months) extensions you can get for brief, reply brief, request for rehearing.

One question on what docs don't need a signature.  Maybe best to just make a chart about this one.

I had 2 on protest: when can you submit and what can you submit (prior art, public use, etc.).

I had a weird question about a patent practitioner conflict of interest - is it triggered when you represent family members of an applicant. 

Another question on does the Office look into claims of inequitable conduct/fraud on the office: answer: no, but if a judge determines there to be inequitable conduct, the patent office can act because it is not THEM who did the investigation, but a judge. 

The rest was pretty standard: claim construction, tribbel, Costa rica, 1.131 & 1.132

I hope this helps.

207
So, how hard is it for a law grad to get a job at the USPTO?

Let's say: for an engineer law grad who has passed the patent bar seeking to work on the patent side?

And also for: a polisci type law grad seeking to work on the trademark side?

just curious for a comparative purpose (not currently seeking a job).

208
Consider the following chart from the National Law Journal about placement in the largest 250 firms.

By region
http://www.law.com/img/nlj/charts/composite.pdf

and by top 100 schools
http://www.law.com/pdf/nlj/20080414employment_trends.pdf

For most Tier 2 schools, if you're not in the top 10%, you're probably not going to be making above 100k.  Be mindful that the average salary for a starting lawyers is a bimodal distribution with humps at 145k and 50k.
http://www.nalp.org/content/index.php?pid=522

Treat law school like an investment.  There's a very good chance you will not succeed; that you will spend 3 years not making money; that you will come out with $150k in debt; and you will only make 60k to start.  In what other circumstance would you give up 150k and three years of your life to make a 60k/yr annual return?

Most importantly, don't get cocky.  Everyone who goes to law school thinks they'll be top 10%.  Yet, 90% won't.  Everyone did well in college: that's why you're in law school.  Sure, engineers are more inclined to logic, but are they more articulate? Are they accustomed to reading at all? 

And when you get out of law school, let's say you do land one of those high-paying firm jobs.  You will earn every last penny that they pay you.  If you're not willing to work 60-70 hour weeks, being a lawyer is not for you.  And if you go to trial: don't plan on sleeping more than 5 hours a night that whole month beforehand.  Do you have a family that will tolerate such a lifestyle?

Oh, and if you can't bring in business, don't plan on making partner.  No matter how many billables you put up, they will let you go after 6 years if you are not bringing in business (or maybe they'll make you senior counsel until it's time for the next round of layoffs). After all, why pay you when they can bring in a new kid who has the potential to bring in a book of business. 

Now, sorry to give you the gloom & doom outlook about law, but I think it's something important for you to recognize that, like every other endeavor, there is a chance for failure.  Granted, your odds of success are higher being an engineer, but you still need to be a good lawyer, too.

If you walk away with one thing, it should be this:
Don't go to law school to get rich.  Go to law school to become a lawyer.  Lawyering is about clients.  That's why it's a profession: we look after people and the problem that come with them. 

My suggestion is to go to law school for one year and see if it works out.  If your grades aren't good (top third or so), be willing to walk away, unless you really want to be a lawyer.  Firms are already closing offices: Sonnenshein just fired all of its summer associates and incoming new attorneys in CLT.  Be mindful that we are in a recession.  You'll hear more about this at the end of the summer, but firms will be cutting back.  Yes, IP litigation is still doing well right now, but firms will be more willing to move associates from other practice groups to IP lit (especially since you don't need an eng background to do lit- some firms have successful business models where they have few science types litigating patent cases) than hire someone they don't know with no trial experience. 

Good luck, just keep in mind that we're going into a recession. 

209
Asked by Pat.Bar to remove references to their services.

Pages: 1 ... 9 10 11 12 13 [14]


Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.389 seconds with 21 queries.