Menu

Show posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Show posts Menu

Messages - IITravel01

#1
Have a couple questions I'm hoping some can help me with.

I understand that it's difficult to trademark a Surname in the U.S. unless it's rare or unique.  My first question is if you add a common word to the trademark application with the Surname (ie. Bogart or Tillmore), is it possible to get approved to a trademark then?  Example:  "Bogart's stew" or "Tillmore's grits" if nobody else is using it or will it also be denied for Surname or descriptive?

Second:  What if a U.S. trademark for a surname was approved in the past but has been been expired for almost a decade.  Is there a way to take over that trademark, since it was once approved, and submit a trademark application for that Surname (without having any relation to that name or trademark)?  Say there was a business open for decades called "Tillmore's" but the business closed and the trademark has expired over 5 years after the business closed and there's been no use of that trademark for over 3 years that can be found with doing a search?  Can someone get a trademark of that surname, since it was once registered but now expired, even though it's a surname and would be denied on regular surname grounds?  Here's an example of what I'd like to do.  Tillmore's for a diner and Tillmore's grits for a dish they were known for where both trademarked, but the diner closed and the trademarks have expired and there's no place that has been making Tillmore's grits for years that can be found doing a search for.  Say I wanted to resurrect the Tillmore brand and produce Tillmore's grits.  I know that if I just went about doing this without a trademark and it becomes successful, someone else could do the same with the same name and refer to the original name as their inspiration and not from the recent success of me bringing back that name, so I'd rather secure the trademark first before going about making "Tillmore's grits" (or the original trademark owner sees the success and decides to bring back their own "Tillmore's grits" even though they let the trademark expire).  So I received a E.U. trademark for Tillmore's and apply for a U.S. trademark for Tillmore's but get "Surname" denial.  Is there a way to get the trademark in the U.S. approved for "Tillmore" or should I try to apply for a "Tillmore's grits" trademark or would that probably be denied also?

Third:  Is there any way to obtain a U.S. trademark on the grounds that you already own a foreign trademark (ie., E.U. trademark with Paris Convention or BeNeLux Trademark with Madrid Protocol if that makes a difference) for a Surname (Surnames generally are allowed in E.U. trademarks:  frkelly.com/surnames-as-trade-marks-eutm-regulation )?  Or for descriptive word names (ie., San Francisco Sandwiches)?  What I'm asking is is there some kind of loophole or rule that applies if you own the trademark in a foreign location that will allow you to obtain that trademark in the U.S. for the same goods and services, even if it would usually be denied in the U.S. for either Surname or descriptive words?  I'm wondering this partly because I notice a business that opened up recently seems to have a descriptive name approved "Hollywood Burger" that I would think would be denied (ie., Hollywood Sandwich).  On this topic, I learned a bit about E.U. and Benelux trademarks through trial and error recently.  For example:  I tried to trademark a "new" word by combining two words that are usually used separate (ie., picture frame as pictureframe = denied, unless the new combined word is considered an "unusual combination" :  boip.int/wps/portal/site/trademarks/what-is/what-not/no-distinctiveness/!ut/p/a0/04_Sj9CPykssy0xPLMnMz0vMAfGjzOKdg5w8HZ0MHQ0szFwMDTxdLQLMg919DUzdjfSDU_P0C7IdFQHin0VY/   and   out-law.com/page-4297  ) but was denied still as descriptive.  But I also learned that what might be denied as descriptive in a BeNeLux trademark (ie., San Francisco Burger may be denied in BeNeLux, but get approved in the E.U.), might be approved in a E.U. trademark rather oddly (or this could be a loophole I accidentally discovered).

Appreciate any responses.

#2
Sorry, maybe I should have been more clear.  The E.U. trademark doesn't use the Madrid Standard but European Law (ie., Germany), but there are a few countries in Europe that do use the Madrid standard (ie., Luxembourg), not the E.U. Law.  A bit confusing. 

www dot mintz dot com/newsletter/2010/Advisories/0743-1110-NAT-IP/web.html
#3
Here's possibly a interesting situation regarding a foreign trademark if anyone out there is familiar with different international trademarks.  So, let's say I see a name of a company that has a live U.S. trademark.  Searching you find that they had a E.U. trademark, but it's expired for 5 months (less than the 6 month grace period to renew).  Say I went to a European country that uses the Madrid System and applied for the same name trademark.  A few days before the end of the 6 month grace period the original owner renews the E.U. trademark.  I would have expected the trademark I filed to be denied, but no.  The country that I filed for the trademark granted my trademark.  What would I have to worry about if I used the name in the Madrid System country I trademarked the name in, if anything?
#4
Thanks.  Maybe I should have added that in researching the name, the last use of the name was I could find was in 2006 by the trademark owner and the trademark expired in 2007.  If the trademark hasn't been used in over 3 years, is the process for application any different than from a new (unused previously) trademark name?  I did find that another company actually used the same name in 2013 (may have been with the permission of the trademark owner), but they appear to have never trademarked the name and I have confirmed that they aren't currently using the name.

Here's an additional aspect, if this trademark was approved in the European Union, how would that effect the E.U. or U.S. application if it was denied in the U.S.?
#5
Another quick question for anyone out there that knows the answer.  If someone checks the U.S. Trademark search and finds a trademark of a name that's been expired for almost a decade.  Can another person trademark that same name without any problems or objections if it's not being used?  Say I wanted to trademark the name Siegfried's (not the actual name) and there's not a live trademark of that name and any trademarks currently show dead, is there anything out of the usual application process to trademark that name?
#6
Thanks for the response.
#7
Hi,  New to the trademark process and have a couple question I hope someone can give a simple answer to.

Say I see that a company has recently trademarked the name "Hollywood Burger", which I would think would be denied as being "descriptive", but the 2013 application was granted in 2016.  If I wanted to open a hot dog place and call it "Hollywood Hot Dogs" and it gets denied for "descriptive", how did "Hollywood Burger" get their trademark approved.  Similarly, how does "Hot Dog on a Stick" get a trademark but "Corn Dog on a Stick" also get denied for being "descriptive" (even with a Dead trademark for the same name from the 80's)?

A second question, if I've applied for a trademark "San Francisco style Sourdough Bread Bowl" (awaiting a "denied" response in Europe currently) and included NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "BREAD BOWL" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN.  NO CLAIM IS MADE TO THE EXCLUSIVE RIGHT TO USE "SAN FRANCISCO STYLE SOURDOUGH BREAD" APART FROM THE MARK AS SHOWN. to a U.S. application, would it be possible to get the trademark granted on the use of the "new" phrase of the combined use of both common phrases combined together in the U.S.?

Thanks.


www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com