1
Patent Drafting/Interpretation / "at least one..."
« on: 02-12-11 at 11:16 am »
I often see claims drafted along the lines of:
"A contraption comprising at least one widget and at least one gizmo..."
What is the advantage of phrasing the claim in such a way instead of just saying
"A contraption comprising a widget and a gizmo..."?
"A contraption comprising at least one widget and at least one gizmo..."
What is the advantage of phrasing the claim in such a way instead of just saying
"A contraption comprising a widget and a gizmo..."?
