I just discovered this forum, it seems like there is alot people have to say on this topic.
I received my JD 2 years ago, I was practicing at a small PI firm out of law school just to get some legal experience, I've been doing that for over a year. I passed the patent bar earlier this year and it seems like, after searching for jobs for about 3-4 months that my career prospects in patent law seem worse than they were before I passed the Illinois bar exam.
I have a B.S. in cellular biology from a top 50 school, my major required that I take some courses with masters students, and I went to law school right after college at a lower tier law school that has a good IP program, at least according to ranking systems.
All I have seen and been told by many patent attorneys is that there are lots of positions for experienced attorneys but that because I have no experience, I will not be able to get a foot in a door without a great deal of luck. Also the fact that I do not have an advanced science degree is also a severe handicap. All of the attorneys I spoke to, however, have said to try and get into the USPTO as an examiner and one even said that a B.S. in bio might be attractive to them.
I toyed with the notion of trying to get a Masters in biology but the large student loan burden I have from law school and the 7 years I have already spent in school total makes this option unattractive.
I'd like to get some thoughts on this. Would it be impossible to get a position in one of the examiner groups at the USPTO with a B.S. in bio and a J.D./law and patent license? Are my career hopes dead in the water without any kind of advanced science degree? I know that the USPTO doesn't appear to be hiring any examiners at this moment after checking the government job board and USPTO website.
I just find it hard to believe that in order to do this kind of work, you need to have every type of degree under the sun made by man. Any suggestions would be appreciated before I throw in the towel and go back to trying car accident cases.
