In general, when doing multiple dependency questions, only select an answer that appears verbatim in sec. 608.01(n). Answer B is not on the list, close but not exactly. But I don't think that this question is entirely about multiple dependents. I think that reason for B being considered as incorrect is the form of the amendment. Looking carefully at answer B (on the actual test because underlining isn't supported on this board), the "s" is added to "claim" without being underlined. D and E are in equal or better multiple dependent form than B, but the amendments are improperly made.
Some examiners might let B slide without sending out a Notice of Non-Compliant Amendment, but A is the only answer that cannot be properly rejected by an examiner.
I think that another reason is that "in any one" is underlined, in lieu of "any one of".
Do you have any idea as to why this question is answered the way it is? I can't figure out why A is not also correct, as there is only one instance of "steam" in line 4. The answers state that it is incorrect because there are two instances...
A patent application is filed with the following original Claim 1.
A steam cooker comprising:
(i) a steam generating chamber having a steam generator;
(ii) a cooking chamber adjacent to said steam generating chamber for receiving steam
from said steam; and
(iii) a heat exchanger secured within said steam generator, said heat exchanger
including at least one heating zone comprised of an inner having raised surface
projections thereon, an outer panel having raised surface projections thereon, and
a path between said raised surface projections whereby flue gases may pass for
heating the walls of the heat exchanger.
Assuming all of the following amendments are supported by the original disclosure in the specification, which amendment is in accord with proper PTO amendment practice and procedure?
(A) In Claim 1, line 4, after "steam" insert, --generator--.
(B) In Claim 1, line 6, after "inner" insert --panel--.
(C) In Claim 1, line 6, delete [one], insert --two--, and amend "zone" to read -zones--.
(D) In Claim 1, line 3, after "chamber" (second occurrence) delete [for receiving] and insert --to produce sufficient quantities of gas and--.
(E) In Claim 1, line 4, delete "secured within" and insert --attached to--.