Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: question on mark vs graphic vs mark+graphic  (Read 701 times)

ks93

  • Guest
question on mark vs graphic vs mark+graphic
« on: 08-12-06 at 08:49 pm »

Our company's product has been out over a year, and we're getting
around to registering the trademark, and I've got some questions:

We'd like to include a photographic image the product in the trademark
application in the expectation that a visual similarity by potential
copies would violate the trademark.

In earlier archives of the website our front page showed our product
with a background.  For purposes of the application, Can we crop out
the unnecessary background to generate the graphic mark , and still
retain the date of priority that the website page had ?

Any help, pointers or citations is appreciated,
Logged

JSonnabend

  • Guest
Re: question on mark vs graphic vs mark+graphic
« Reply #1 on: 08-14-06 at 06:33 am »

As a general proposition, one does not register "the product" as a trademark.  Instead, one generally registers its name, logo, label, etc.  In these instances, submitting a picture of the product itself would lead to a largely useless registration.

That said, one can seek trademark registration for product packaging configuration and even product configuration itself.  These fall under the heading of "trade dress", and are difficult to push through the PTO (and to protect at all).  The fairly recent Supreme Court case of Wal-Mart Stores v. Samara Bros. discusses trade dress protection at some length.

- Jeff
Logged

nsmart27

  • Guest
Re: question on mark vs graphic vs mark+graphic
« Reply #2 on: 08-15-06 at 01:36 pm »

that's an interesting reference.

Thank you,
Logged
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.131 seconds with 15 queries.