Dear Mr. Auslander,
Sir, I fully appreciate there is a difference between a "lawyer that is working for you as distinguished from one working for the fee." I accept without question your own assertion that you are one of the former.
My point is that people should first ask themselves whether or not they need to contact a lawyer at all. Suffering the expense to file an application for patent or registering a copyright is primarily a business decision, not a legal one.
While some lawyers may be able to offer business advice, this is like asking a doctor about medical investments in the stock market. A few rare physicians may be able to provide good stock tips, but doctors are mainly to be consulted for medical advice. Similarly, my position is that lawyers should be consulted for legal advice. Nothing else. The principal questions to be posed to a IP lawyer are:
can I get a patent on my invention?
can I copyright my creation?
can I apply for trademark protection?
how can I get a patent on my invention?
how can I protect my creation with copyright?
etc.
Asking a lawyer, "SHOULD I file a patent?" or "should I apply for a trademark?" seems to me to be asking him to answer questions well outside his scope of professional training and responsibilty.
Moreover, as you intimate, lawyers who make their living from preparing and prosecuting applications have a severe conflict of interest in providing this business advice to their clients.
This is the principal reason why I do not in my practice prepare and file applications. By not burdening my business advice with my own self-interest I am never confronted by such conflict.
Regards,