Just as a follow-up question; powers are on an application-by-application basis, right? Klav could have powers in parent #1, I could have powers in child #2. I can TD #2 over #1, but not #1 over #2. FWIW, I "force" clients to sign TDs to extent possible. Simple 2 do, fax OK. I want no mistake that client knowingly gave-up client's property (patent term), and bound itself by "K" to US courts 2 keep #1 and #2 in common ownership.