Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists  (Read 723 times)

Yak

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
    • View Profile

If there is no live federally registered mark for a given proposed trademark, but there is an exact match of the proposed mark in a state registry, what is the best way to advise a client.  While the proposed mark may register due to the examining attorney only using federal marks in the search, the state mark has been in use since at least 1987 and has been renewed several times. 
Logged
Not legal advice... Batteries are not included... Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental... Eating raw or undercooked meat, poultry, eggs or seafood poses a health risk.

Kaitlin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile
Re: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists
« Reply #1 on: 10-30-11 at 07:41 pm »

You haven't said whether or not the marks are used on goods or services that run in similar channels of trade or whether there are other factors impacting likelihood of confusion.  If other indicia of likelihood of confusion are present, I would not recommend going forward with a conflicting mark. 

The question isn't whether or not the PTO will find the senior mark, but whether the proposed mark will hold up if challenged by the senior user in an opposition or cancellation or infringement case. 




Logged
This post is an off-the-cuff musing and should not be misconstrued as legal advice. THERE IS NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US. Proper legal advice requires full disclosure of facts-not appropriate to a public forum-and attorney research time and effort which has not been expended here.

JSonnabend

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists
« Reply #2 on: 11-01-11 at 07:14 am »

This is an ordinary "senior unregistered user" situation.  What exactly are you concerned about?  Where senior unregistered rights exist, a junior user/senior registrant has junior rights.

- Jeff
Logged
SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com

Yak

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
    • View Profile
Re: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists
« Reply #3 on: 11-01-11 at 07:28 am »

You haven't said whether or not the marks are used on goods or services that run in similar channels of trade or whether there are other factors impacting likelihood of confusion.  If other indicia of likelihood of confusion are present, I would not recommend going forward with a conflicting mark. 

Yes, the marks are substantially identical and the junior mark (is not currently in use - plans to file an "intent to use") and the senior unregistered mark are used for goods that definitely run in similar channels and would be under the same IC. 

The question isn't whether or not the PTO will find the senior mark, but whether the proposed mark will hold up if challenged by the senior user in an opposition or cancellation or infringement case. 

So if the senior unregistered mark would likely prevail in a cancellation or infringement case the junior (applicant) probably should not file?

This is an ordinary "senior unregistered user" situation.  What exactly are you concerned about?  Where senior unregistered rights exist, a junior user/senior registrant has junior rights.

Do you have a reference where I can read more about the junior rights of the junior user/senior registrant. 

Logged
Not legal advice... Batteries are not included... Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental... Eating raw or undercooked meat, poultry, eggs or seafood poses a health risk.

JSonnabend

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists
« Reply #4 on: 11-01-11 at 07:55 am »

Reference?  That's a tough one.  It's just basic TM law.  Do a WL search on "common law rights" and "senior" and terms like that.

Adding to what Kaitlin said, the question is not just whether your client will be sued or can register.  There is also the important business decision -- which many lawyers neglect to discuss -- concerning whether Swiss-cheese registration and/or use is acceptable from a business standpoint.

- Jeff
Logged
SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com

Yak

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
    • View Profile
Re: recommendation where no us reg mark but state mark exists
« Reply #5 on: 11-01-11 at 08:00 am »

Thank you.
Logged
Not legal advice... Batteries are not included... Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental... Eating raw or undercooked meat, poultry, eggs or seafood poses a health risk.
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.081 seconds with 17 queries.