Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Copyright assignments used to prevent patients from posting reviews of doctors  (Read 1429 times)

artchain

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 202
    • View Profile
    • ArtChain Artist and Art Group Directory
    • Email

Apparently doctors are using a new form contract that requires patients to assign them the copyrights to any reviews that the patient may write.  As the copyright owner, the doctor can then use DMCA takedown requests to force online review sites such as RateMDs.com or Yelp.com to remove unfavorable reviews.

Seems like a stretch, but apparently this is real.  You can read about it at Eric Goldman's Technology & Marketing Law Blog, blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/04/announcing_doct.htm

Kaitlin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 695
    • View Profile

I was hoping this was a belated April fool's piece, but you seem to be right, Artchain! 
Very disturbing trend. 
Logged
This post is an off-the-cuff musing and should not be misconstrued as legal advice. THERE IS NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US. Proper legal advice requires full disclosure of facts-not appropriate to a public forum-and attorney research time and effort which has not been expended here.

MYK

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1168
    • View Profile

I'm a little surprised that it would matter, since websites automatically take down any content that anyone sends an objection over, without ever bothering to investigate whether the complainant has any rights.  Investigating would cost the website owner time and money, and failure to do a takedown promptly kills their safe harbor under the DMCA.

Oh well.  Something new to watch out for, anyway.
Logged
Disclaimer: not only am I not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer.  Therefore, this does not constitute legal advice.

Isaac

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5163
    • View Profile

Wouldn't a fairly easy work around would be for the patient not to author the review?  For example, I could write a review for my wife based on the facts as she relates them to me.   (I could even use a few "fair use" quotes.   My wife could attest to the truth of the review without authoring any copyrightable material.

There would still be the problem that the patient is breaking the contract-based prohibitions, but most likely those contract terms are not enforceable as being against public policy.
Logged
Isaac

artchain

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 202
    • View Profile
    • ArtChain Artist and Art Group Directory
    • Email

I'm a little surprised that it would matter, since websites automatically take down any content that anyone sends an objection over, without ever bothering to investigate whether the complainant has any rights.  Investigating would cost the website owner time and money, and failure to do a takedown promptly kills their safe harbor under the DMCA.

True, however submitting a falsified DMCA takedown claim is perjury, and most doctors aren't going to do that. 

Isaac

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5163
    • View Profile

True, however submitting a falsified DMCA takedown claim is perjury, and most doctors aren't going to do that. 

Not only that, but if the copyright claim is false the true author can respond to the takedown notice and require the host to put the material back in ten days.
Logged
Isaac
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.079 seconds with 17 queries.