Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jp]

This technology was previously posted in advance of the recent Earthquake in Japan, I believe the original post was March 8, 2011, and was removed by the administrator, . . presumably by accident and or it was thought to be spam.

http://i53.tinypic.com/2d7eanp.gif

[Yak]

That machine does not really make much sense?

[Jp]

You have gotta Be Kidding Me, . . .                

This is a mobile machine that has the ability to carry a tool that has that capacity to  move a heavy or large object, .  . . in other words, operating somewhat  "like the "Jaws of life" , capable of exerting high pressure, this power combination then not only has the capacity to grip an object it can then move it, (as illustrated), by virtue of a winching cable.

If a rescuer during a search for victims of an earthquake disaster, finds a victim who is trapped or has a stone or concrete object pinning them down, the the tool which can be carried while still attached to the main power, will assist the rescuer to do a job that would have been impossible without the machine including saving a life"


http://i53.tinypic.com/2d7eanp.gif

Therefore as I see it this machine is of value and the date of the entry has a benefit in the negotiation of enterprise since it allows the forum viewer to know the date of disclosure.

Before you decide to wipe out, erase, or move my post to a place where it can not be seen by forum viewers, . . I ask of you please have a consideration of discussing this with me, . . since it is not a wrongful, obscene, scam, spam, type of post.


If you still feel that this machine does not make sense, . . . who knows maybe I'm loosing it ? Lets discuss it's obvious usefulness, cuz as I see it this is the * "edge of advantage" and an absolute must have for earthquake rescue !

* Quote by Jp

[MYK]

What's the novel aspect?  (Obviously, don't answer here if there is one.)  Tracked heavy equipment is known, I've seen the jaws-on-a-cable things before, helicopter delivery is obvious.  Do you have something that will overcome prior art?

[Jp]

This sort of question always interest me, and my first thought is, . . . .
"if there isn't a better way to save a life", like those incidents that were documented in the Haiti Earthquake Disaster, i.e., "people still alive pinned down by obstructions that could not be moved", . . . . . .And wasn't used then or in the, California Earthquake, or in the one before that where ever it was

Then how could someone say that it is  obvious ?


Prior Art and Use should both be viewed as intersecting in a place that has not been previously established, that in itself establishes the, "indisputable ground for Use and or novelty i.e., (need but do not have) ".

Where the, "Inventor" or "person without title", bringing the useful implement of necessity, into service of a Society should in some way be justly rewarded!

Need I say more to or about  the Justice that Rules over My Liberty and Independence? My Freedom of Enterprise? that great countries incentive system?

I will be delighted to have your reply.

[Yak]

Sounds like JP has just made a laypersons description of the rationale behind the secondary considerations for non-obviousness?

Objective evidence relevant to the issue of obviousness must be evaluated by Office personnel. Id. at 17-18, 148 USPQ at 467. Such evidence, sometimes referred to as "secondary considerations," may include evidence of commercial success, long-felt but unsolved needs, failure of others, and unexpected results. The evidence may be included in the specification as filed, accompany the application on filing, or be provided in a timely manner at some other point during the prosecution. The weight to be given any objective evidence is made on a case-by-case basis. The mere fact that an applicant has presented evidence does not mean that the evidence is dispositive of the issue of obviousness.

Out of curiosity, JP what is the purpose of your regular quips of invention disclosure and the associated links which show the short .gif's of your inventions?

[Jp]

Yak, . .
To satisfy your curiosity, I have posted these basically in some cases, just as a,

"you seen it here and you seen it here first", and secondly as a dig at corporate government within a government, . . because any project that is impressive enough to be used to con the people that government is doing their job in spending our tax money, they will use as propaganda, and to do this they have to have property rights,
and to get property rights I believe they, (congressmen, senators, politicians), will
conspire, lie cheat, steal, and more. So I haven't given up, on patents, but I know that it takes more than patents, it takes beating them at their own game, which is not easy, since their money is basically limitless.

Therefore it is more than competition, it is fighting the enemy of freedom, . . you might even call it war.

So when I post something like the Earthquake tool, I am putting them were they belong, back getting dirty, in their rats nest where they can plan behind close doors their winning strategies.

Because I have got to know these devils and there is no thing to low for them.

Please don't drag me into a discussion, . . all I can tell you is in this day and age, . .
with energy the way it is why do you think they close down the O.E.R.I.

Office of Energy Related Inventions, . . what good reason could they have had ?

let me say this after Brown died in that plane crash. you don't want to tell me they didn't go through the valuables in the files there, they would not have had  a problem with Brown gone, with Ron Hurd of Fraud investigation in the DOC dead, and George Blewit chief analyst dead.