Sorry you missed the point of the post. What you're asking for is basically an out of work patent attorney or agent with many years experience in Atlanta. You're not likely to get any currently employed attorneys/agents for two reasons: 1) they already have to meet their billable hours and you're not paying nearly enough for them to consider wasting what little free time they have (see xyzzy's post above who reasoned that he had made a silly mistake when reading the salary), 2) conflict of interest problems.
Plus you're asking part-time patent attorneys/agents to be available on weekends for some strange reason.
Furthermore, if you would like to do calculations, please perform maximums and minimums so that the whole picture is shown and not just one that may be skewed by several factors which you are approximating without the proper foundation to do so.
Attorney
$7,500
12-17 hours per week for 3 months
144-204 hours total
$36.76 - $52.08 per hour
Agent
$5,000
8-10 hours per week for 3 months
96-120 hours total
$41.67 - $52.08 per hour
At best you're going to be paying the attorney with more experience the same as the agent with less. In all cases but the one with the least number of hours/week you're going to be paying the agent with 5+ years experience more than the attorney with 8+. Also, assuming the work product is reviewed by an examiner with the same number of years experience, it will likely be the case that the examiner will be making more per hour to review the work product than the attorney/agent that prepared it. Hence the "is it April already" comment.
Sincerely,
Mr. April 1.
Dablueman,
While your calculations of the maximum and minimum pay rates are logical based upon your understanding, or lack thereof, of what has been proposed, your ultimate conclusions are not indicative of what is being proposed. And yes, maybe these positions will be more favorable to out of work attorneys/agents, retired agents/attorneys, or like I said earlier, someone looking to make a little extra cash with the potential for growth in the future.
Furthermore, I never stated in what capacity each individual would be used. For example, if I am paying the patent attorney the same rate to sweep floors as I am paying the patent agent to draft patents, will the patent attorney be upset, probably not. You are highlighting the differences in experience and insinuating that that alone will justify a higher pay rate. And I agree that under other circumstances it does, but it does not necessarily make this the rule. For example, if a seasoned attorney accepted a part-time job at Target as a cashier to make some extra cash for the holidays, should he expect to receive attorney pay? Of course not.
As I've stated numerous times, the hours are flexible and the pay rate is negotiable. Of course, all of this will be discussed with potential applicants, and then they can make an informed decision. So it is ultimately up to each interested individual whether the pay is comparable to the workload and their individual situations. By no means are we trying to get over on anyone as your "April 1" comment insinuates.
Now, I am very interested to find out what potential conflicts of interest you are referencing. And yes, I am asking agents/attorneys to be available for some weekends. Anyone who wants to work, needs money, or believes in a cause doesn't mind sacrificing for such.
Also, there was never any mention of an examiner being employed to review the agents/attorney's work product. While I do look forward to any constructive feedback, I can do without snide remarks as to the validity of what I am proposing, so maybe I did miss the point of your original post.
Thank You,
Braxton