Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Method or means?  (Read 379 times)

Patentstudent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Method or means?
« on: 09-28-10 at 07:49 am »

I just have a quick question.

Suppose I want to file an application for a way to prevent a common cold by giving people a dosage of a combination of a vitamin and a few amino acids.

Is it wise to claim a method (to prevent a cold by ......) and a means (for example a softgel with the ingredients), or just one of the two?

Thank you for your advice. 
Logged

JimIvey

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5413
    • View Profile
    • IveyLaw -- Turning Caffeine into Patents(sm)
Re: Method or means?
« Reply #1 on: 09-28-10 at 09:33 am »

I don't do life sciences or chemical work, so take this with a fair amount of skepticism.

If both are new and non-obvious, I'd claim both.  Oftentimes, the substance isn't itself new, so people merely claim the method of treatment.  However, if the substance itself is new and non-obvious (or at least believed to be), claim it too.

Regards.
Logged
--
James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
http://www.iveylaw.com
Friends don't let friends file provisional patent applications.

Patentstudent

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Re: Method or means?
« Reply #2 on: 09-28-10 at 10:07 am »

Thank you.
Logged
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.071 seconds with 17 queries.