What I fail to understand is that if there is such a paucity of work, then how can a patent attorney continue to charge $200 (starting) for work? Should capitalism and a free market eventually translate into lesser wages. I say this because I still see people continue to harbor hopes (like me) of becoming a patent practitioner and getting more wages than what they get in their current profession
Supply - demand curves can be simple. If adjacent stores are selling the same product, then most people are likely to purchase the product that cost less.
In many situations, however the relationship of the price of a product or service to the demand is far more complex. There is no easy way to determine if two patent practitioners will provide the same quality product. One metric of quality is the years of experience, or number of applications filed or patents granted by the practitioner; low price (obviously) will not help with that.
Also, the price of the product (to some extent at least) communicates the quality of a product. If one street vendor is selling hot dogs for $2.50, and another vendor is selling (supposedly) the same hot dogs for 25 cents, most of us would avoid the 25 cent hot dog. So at that extreme, the very low price communicates that there is something wrong with the cheap hot dog. Similarly, a very low price quote for a patent job communicates that there is something wrong with the quality of the service. (How low is "very low"? I don't know.)
Another factor, related to the experience factor, is references. Anyone can look at the PTO web site and randomly select a practitioner. I'm guessing however that most potential applicants seek guidance from general practice attorneys, other inventors, contacts through business groups, or picks a local practitioner. It is difficult for an inexperienced practitioner to get good recommendations.
Furthermore, development of a product may cost orders of magnitude more than the cost of filing a patent application; and the potential value of the patent can be orders of magnitude greater than the cost of the patent application. Most applicants would not be motivated to save a couple thousand dollars on a patent application for an invention, when the patent may be worth several million dollars.
All those factors, and a whole bunch I didn't mention, work against the
tendency for capitalism and a free market eventually translate into lesser wages.