Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
Due to spam with have restricted the number of posts of our members.
We will be doing a complete update to the website shortly, including new hardware and software.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Confusion in USPTO translate to District Ct Analysis in attorneys fees/willful  (Read 423 times)
TataBox
Senior Member
****
Posts: 691



View Profile
« on: 07-28-10 at 08:36 pm »

I was just curious if anyone had any information relating to the usage of a similar registered mark by an infringer, after that infringer already received a rejection by the PTO under 2(d), in later a infringement action in Federal Court.

Does this notice by the USPTO play a role in willfulness?

Logged
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: 07-29-10 at 07:00 am »

I haven't had the pleasure of those facts, but it certainly goes to the issue of notice of the senior mark.  Of course, timing of events is important in this scenario (i.e., who knew what when).

- Jeff
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.378 seconds with 18 queries.