Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Use of Still Images from Public Domain films  (Read 493 times)

jamiederelict

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Use of Still Images from Public Domain films
« on: 07-21-10 at 07:46 pm »

I work as a t-shirt designer.  I have been thinking about using still images from various public domain films for my work.  I understand it's fair use because it is a derivative work of the original film.  But what I want to know is can I use the likeness of an actor or actress from one of these films due to their image being part of the film, or should I attempt to procure likeness rights?  I'm torn because I feel the actors may still have their own personal right of publicity, but I also would like to create my art as inexpensively as possible.  And would promotional materials for these films be in public domain also?  Thank you in advance for any input.

Jamie
Logged

Smokin

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 324
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Use of Still Images from Public Domain films
« Reply #1 on: 07-22-10 at 07:35 am »

There are threads in this forum that explain the difference between right of publicity, VS copyrights. While you wont have any issue with copyrights if you use public domain stuff, you may find right of publicity issues.


It used to be that when someone died, so did any right of publicity, but that is slowly changing from state to state.

http://jjkaufman.com/articles/artistvcelb.htm
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/cacode/CIV/5/d4/1/2/2/3/s3344
http://www.in.gov/legislative/ic/code/title32/ar36/ch1.pdf
Logged
Disclaimer: Not a lawyer

Yak

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 500
    • View Profile
Re: Use of Still Images from Public Domain films
« Reply #2 on: 07-22-10 at 08:01 am »

I understand it's fair use because it is a derivative work of the original film. 

Also, I think you may be misunderstanding what constitutes fair use. 

A “derivative work” is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications, which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”.

[T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies ... for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
Logged
Not legal advice... Batteries are not included... Any resemblance to real persons, living or dead is purely coincidental... Eating raw or undercooked meat, poultry, eggs or seafood poses a health risk.
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.084 seconds with 16 queries.