Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
Due to spam with have restricted the number of posts of our members.
We will be doing a complete update to the website shortly, including new hardware and software.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Public Disclosure License Deal  (Read 1649 times)
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« on: 05-08-10 at 08:37 pm »

Looking for a Good Deal


Please see next post.

ReVised Edition

« Last Edit: 05-10-10 at 07:04 pm by Jp » Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: 05-10-10 at 07:08 pm »



Revision

http://i41.tinypic.com/wbcbgl.jpg
Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: 05-11-10 at 06:46 am »



Development

http://i40.tinypic.com/20stwnl.png
Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: 05-11-10 at 08:34 am »

http://www.google.com/patents?id=pa17AAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=inflatable%20toilet%20seat&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=U_4CAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=EzgkAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&pg=PA3#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=ikkJAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=inflatable%20toilet&rview=1&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=PWQJAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=inflatable%20toilet&rview=1&pg=PA2#v=onepage&q=inflatable%20toilet&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=gICVAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=inflatable%20toilet&rview=1&pg=PA2#v=onepage&q&f=false
http://www.google.com/patents?id=kpohAAAAEBAJ&zoom=4&dq=inflatable%20toilet&rview=1&pg=PA1#v=onepage&q=inflatable%20toilet&f=false
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
DogDayPM 9er9er9er
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 999



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: 05-11-10 at 09:09 am »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   Grin
Logged

Any and all disclaimers you may see on this forum used by members more experienced and/or smarter than I, are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: 05-16-10 at 10:22 am »

I did know that I would get some pretentious humor, but after all crappers are a little on the crappy side.
But an Emergency arises and toilets are part of the call, when crowded conditions arise, being prepared is part of the response effort, I have not looked at all of the inflatable seat that my friend  JSonnabend  has posted but I will get there if they do not suit the, "emergency need" then it won't do this is not intended for toilets, it is intended to supply the demand for conditions where no toilets, are available,
and the delivery can be efficient, where each can be packed in a small package and many packages can be provided. you may think that the great outdoors can do the job but that is hectic especially at night were there are crowds, make shift hospitals and sleeping quarters have emergency need !

I submitted this to a large corporation that had an internet form so,
I posted this because, I can take advantage of a public disclosure, sorry I did
not mean to be crappy.

So, if the prior art doesn't cover the inflatable that does not use the procedure including the individual use sealing than I may have a product that suits the needs for emergency's or the man who thought he had everything.

Hey I work in Emergency Response, What can I say!

To show you I'm a good sport, here ya go a marvelous invention to cheer you up !


http://i39.tinypic.com/2zpt8i0.jpg



BTW, I looked at the prior art and I thank you JSonnabend, . .

I am believing that my last entry is an advantage, with and including two sided

adhesive.

« Last Edit: 05-16-10 at 10:33 am by Jp » Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
MYK
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 1149



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: 05-16-10 at 05:10 pm »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   Grin
It's alimentary, my dear DogDay.
Logged

Disclaimer: not only am I not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer.  Therefore, this does not constitute legal advice.
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: 05-17-10 at 12:58 am »


OK ! But I'll be Sittin Pretty !


http://i42.tinypic.com/35ksc2x.jpg



http://i39.tinypic.com/2zpt8i0.jpg



Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
DogDayPM 9er9er9er
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 999



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: 05-17-10 at 07:49 am »

It's alimentary, my dear DogDay.

(Groans).  Shoulda expected that one!   Tongue
Logged

Any and all disclaimers you may see on this forum used by members more experienced and/or smarter than I, are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: 05-17-10 at 12:16 pm »

I get the feeling You guys are talking over my head, . .

lets get down to my level, . . .

http://i41.tinypic.com/6stlbk.jpg
Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: 05-22-10 at 09:54 am »

I submitted this to a large corporation that had an internet form so,
I posted this because, I can take advantage of a public disclosure, sorry I did
not mean to be crappy.

Just in case others come across this thread, "public disclosure" does nothing to prevent another entity (e.g., a "large corporation") from making, using or selling your invention without compensation to you.

- Jeff
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: 05-22-10 at 10:36 am »

Are you saying that a public disclosure or claim of an invention, that shows evidence that the invention in mention, is, (individual to other prior arts), .  will not or can not become a point of legal controversy if another party were to claim rights to the same, within a period of twelve months of the conception ?
« Last Edit: 05-22-10 at 11:27 am by Jp » Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: 05-24-10 at 04:13 am »

Public disclosure is defensive, not offensive.  It can act to stop others from patenting an invention, but it cannot stop them from commercially exploiting it.

- Jeff
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
Jp
Senior Member
****
Posts: 303


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: 07-27-10 at 07:31 pm »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   Grin

Are you sure your not that guy on Miami Vice ?

http://h.imagehost.org/view/0649/Real_Warm_Day
Logged

Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.456 seconds with 16 queries.