Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Public Disclosure License Deal  (Read 1741 times)

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Public Disclosure License Deal
« on: 05-08-10 at 07:37 pm »

Looking for a Good Deal


Please see next post.

ReVised Edition

« Last Edit: 05-10-10 at 06:04 pm by Jp »
Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #1 on: 05-10-10 at 06:08 pm »

Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #2 on: 05-11-10 at 05:46 am »

Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

DogDayPM 9er9er9er

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 999
    • View Profile
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #4 on: 05-11-10 at 08:09 am »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   ;D
Logged
Any and all disclaimers you may see on this forum used by members more experienced and/or smarter than I, are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #5 on: 05-16-10 at 09:22 am »

I did know that I would get some pretentious humor, but after all crappers are a little on the crappy side.
But an Emergency arises and toilets are part of the call, when crowded conditions arise, being prepared is part of the response effort, I have not looked at all of the inflatable seat that my friend  JSonnabend  has posted but I will get there if they do not suit the, "emergency need" then it won't do this is not intended for toilets, it is intended to supply the demand for conditions where no toilets, are available,
and the delivery can be efficient, where each can be packed in a small package and many packages can be provided. you may think that the great outdoors can do the job but that is hectic especially at night were there are crowds, make shift hospitals and sleeping quarters have emergency need !

I submitted this to a large corporation that had an internet form so,
I posted this because, I can take advantage of a public disclosure, sorry I did
not mean to be crappy.

So, if the prior art doesn't cover the inflatable that does not use the procedure including the individual use sealing than I may have a product that suits the needs for emergency's or the man who thought he had everything.

Hey I work in Emergency Response, What can I say!

To show you I'm a good sport, here ya go a marvelous invention to cheer you up !


http://i39.tinypic.com/2zpt8i0.jpg



BTW, I looked at the prior art and I thank you JSonnabend, . .

I am believing that my last entry is an advantage, with and including two sided

adhesive.

« Last Edit: 05-16-10 at 09:33 am by Jp »
Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

MYK

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1168
    • View Profile
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #6 on: 05-16-10 at 04:10 pm »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   ;D
It's alimentary, my dear DogDay.
Logged
Disclaimer: not only am I not a lawyer, I'm not your lawyer.  Therefore, this does not constitute legal advice.

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #7 on: 05-16-10 at 11:58 pm »

Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

DogDayPM 9er9er9er

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 999
    • View Profile
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #8 on: 05-17-10 at 06:49 am »

It's alimentary, my dear DogDay.

(Groans).  Shoulda expected that one!   :P
Logged
Any and all disclaimers you may see on this forum used by members more experienced and/or smarter than I, are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #9 on: 05-17-10 at 11:16 am »

I get the feeling You guys are talking over my head, . .

lets get down to my level, . . .

http://i41.tinypic.com/6stlbk.jpg
Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

JSonnabend

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #10 on: 05-22-10 at 08:54 am »

I submitted this to a large corporation that had an internet form so,
I posted this because, I can take advantage of a public disclosure, sorry I did
not mean to be crappy.

Just in case others come across this thread, "public disclosure" does nothing to prevent another entity (e.g., a "large corporation") from making, using or selling your invention without compensation to you.

- Jeff
Logged
SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #11 on: 05-22-10 at 09:36 am »

Are you saying that a public disclosure or claim of an invention, that shows evidence that the invention in mention, is, (individual to other prior arts), .  will not or can not become a point of legal controversy if another party were to claim rights to the same, within a period of twelve months of the conception ?
« Last Edit: 05-22-10 at 10:27 am by Jp »
Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."

JSonnabend

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #12 on: 05-24-10 at 03:13 am »

Public disclosure is defensive, not offensive.  It can act to stop others from patenting an invention, but it cannot stop them from commercially exploiting it.

- Jeff
Logged
SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com

Jp

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 303
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Public Disclosure License Deal
« Reply #13 on: 07-27-10 at 06:31 pm »

JP, I must say that recently your inventions have gotten a little more.... uh... "crappy".   ;D

Are you sure your not that guy on Miami Vice ?

http://h.imagehost.org/view/0649/Real_Warm_Day
Logged
Wealth of Ideas, October 2007

"The proposed Patent Reform Act of 2007, however, is so consistently and unmistakably biased in favor of large corporations that the purported motivation for the proposed change to a First-to-File system must be viewed with deep suspicion."
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.375 seconds with 19 queries.