Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218
  Print  
Author Topic: Working for the USPTO  (Read 416442 times)
xephay
Junior Member
**
Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #3210 on: 11-05-09 at 09:38 am »

I definitely agree with appealing over a phone call if you know the examiner = english as anything but a first language.

What an absurd observation!  Huh (I'm not familiar with the use of the equal sign in this context, so I assume with the BRI that it means there're some issues when conducting phone calls with examiners not having English as their first language.)  My son and his cousins all do not have English as their first language, and yet they have absolutely no problem communicating in English over the phone or in person.  (As a matter of fact, most people would probably understand them much better than someone whose first language is English and is speaking with, say, a "southern" accent.)  Actually their first language sucks big time, Sad despite some having already finished college with advanced degrees such as JD or PharmD, and the rest on track to finish college and beyond.

I know several people in the Computer/EE AUs having English as their first language, and their English is not unlike that of my nieces and nephews.

Btw I want to apologize in advance for any mistakes in my writing, as English is not my first language.   Wink

PS Nice job, Chris!  You have a record of hijacking a conversation after 3 postings.   Smiley
Logged
ChrisWhewell
Senior Member
****
Posts: 390


View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3211 on: 11-05-09 at 09:55 am »

Smiley   Sorry about that, I'll try to refrain from threadjackings.   

But I do think KSR is at least remotely related to working for the USPTO, and I haven't seen anything really change in 103's, only hear ideas that it has changed so very much.

I agree with you about language used not being relevant per se.

Have a good afternoon   Smiley


Logged

Chris Whewell
www.mypatentagent.com
Notice:   NOTHING IN THIS MESSAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE.  No representations or warranties are made with respect to any of the information contained in this message, and particularly in reference to its accuracy or suitability for any purpose.
Jim_W
Full Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #3212 on: 11-05-09 at 04:10 pm »

My son and his cousins all do not have English as their first language, and yet they have absolutely no problem communicating in English over the phone or in person. 

This is what foreigners actually believe. No insult intended to your family, but there is no shortage of overconfident "english speakers" who can't speak the language to save their lives.

Speaking from my relatively limited experience at the PTO, I'd say that they do have a pretty large body of fluent English speakers in the examiner corps, many of whom are first or 2nd generation immigrants. That being said, they have a surprisingly large body of people that just plain do not speak English. We're not talking about "your accent is difficult to understand over the phone" so much as "it is impossible to have even a semi-confusing conversation with you because you don't know enough basic vocabulary to complete an ordinary sentence without choking"

I ended up drawing pictures and using keywords to explain what i was talking about but mostly I did my best to avoid those people in favor of intermediaries. God forbid you are stuck with them as an examiner for your application.
Logged
tech_spec
Senior Member
****
Posts: 289


View Profile
« Reply #3213 on: 11-05-09 at 04:52 pm »

Granted, English isn't my first or even second language, but I still like to make fun of the Examiner Corps. I don't consider mild or moderate accent to be a problem, but some folks over there sound and write like they've just enrolled in the Aprenda inglés section of the local community college.  Consider this - to get a job in the PTO you must be a US citizen.  To become a US citizen, you must hold a green card for at least 5 years. Given that it takes many years to obtain a green card, it would be fair to assume that most foreign-born Examiners start at the PTO after they've lived in the US for at least 10 years, probably a lot more than that.  And yet, some of them speak and write as if they just came off the boat. 

Seems to me that the PTO should simply enforce a fairly high language fluency standard when hiring.  We are really in the business of "wordsmithing," so why should the fate of our patent applications depend on those who often can't seem to grasp all the intricacies of the English language?  The presence of such folks in the PTO (albeit often exaggerated outside the PTO) still reflects poorly on the Corps.     
Logged
Jim_W
Full Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #3214 on: 11-05-09 at 05:43 pm »

Political correctness makes it impossible for me to engage in a frank discussion of the various cultural and language problems at the PTO, both in its staffing, management and examiner corps. Instead, I will pose the following conundrum, if you will.

About 90 percent of the people the PTO has to interact with on a regular basis are full fledged patent attorneys. So you've got this customer base that speaks English at an extremely advanced level and is approaching this interaction from a somewhat legalistic standpoint. On the other hand, you have people with severe deficits in literacy, professionalism and legal knowledge whose primary motivation is to game the quota system for the least amount of effort.

And of course all the best examiners either leave for private practice or worse, get kicked upstairs into non-examining positions where they proceed to work at home 2 days a week while drawing a 150k a year salary. 
Logged
Examinerguy
Full Member
***
Posts: 83


View Profile Email
« Reply #3215 on: 11-05-09 at 07:36 pm »

Granted, English isn't my first or even second language, but I still like to make fun of the Examiner Corps. I don't consider mild or moderate accent to be a problem, but some folks over there sound and write like they've just enrolled in the Aprenda inglés section of the local community college.  Consider this - to get a job in the PTO you must be a US citizen.  To become a US citizen, you must hold a green card for at least 5 years. Given that it takes many years to obtain a green card, it would be fair to assume that most foreign-born Examiners start at the PTO after they've lived in the US for at least 10 years, probably a lot more than that.  And yet, some of them speak and write as if they just came off the boat. 

Seems to me that the PTO should simply enforce a fairly high language fluency standard when hiring.  We are really in the business of "wordsmithing," so why should the fate of our patent applications depend on those who often can't seem to grasp all the intricacies of the English language?  The presence of such folks in the PTO (albeit often exaggerated outside the PTO) still reflects poorly on the Corps.     

1.) Because overall they don't complain as much as American's do (at least not in our language  Grin).
2.) They have a much better work ethic (on average).
3.) Some of them have relatives in their home country that they support and send money to so they take the job more seriously.
4.) 98% of the day you don't need to speak english.

There is a reason why the majority of SPE's and primarys are foreigners (many who I cannot hold an understandable conversation with). Most Americans quit after a few years because it is more stressful than regular engineering jobs. Don't get me wrong, I would love a fluent english speaking corps for the sake of the attorneys. However there would either have to be a hefty increase in salaries or a doubling in production...because I don't see them replacing a few thousand poorly spoken foreigners with American engineering graduates anytime soon.
Logged
Jim_W
Full Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #3216 on: 11-05-09 at 08:05 pm »

The pay was good enough and the work easy enough that I wanted to work there when I got out of law school. Under the old overtime rules, it would have been a real gravy train.

As for being more stressful than a real engineering job, you best be trolling. That is the most hilarious lie I've heard since my law school's career office said they had a 99 percent placement rate.
Logged
Examinerguy
Full Member
***
Posts: 83


View Profile Email
« Reply #3217 on: 11-05-09 at 08:17 pm »

If you don't mind me asking, what was your major Jim? And what did you examine when you were at the PTO?

On a side note, if the job was so easy the attrition rate wouldn't be 50% during non-recession times...you think the average bachelor degree makes 75K his first year out anywhere else? At the PTO they do (Usually GS7 step 10 + 8000 a year for 4 years). There must be something going on if you don't think its stress.
« Last Edit: 11-05-09 at 09:19 pm by Examinerguy » Logged
Jim_W
Full Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #3218 on: 11-05-09 at 09:52 pm »

The attrition rate was astronomical because people were working there and then lateraling out to the legal industry, either as agents or attorneys. A lot of the young examiners I ran into there were either "in law school" or "applying to law school" or "leaving because they graduated law school and got hired by a patent firm." It was rampant and it seemed like common knowledge that turnover was due to defection rather than burnout.

You make a really good point about most jobs not paying that well the first year out and I honestly don't have a good answer for you there. I suspect the reason is that college students are largely unaware of the USPTO's existence, let alone the pay rate. I know I never heard of it before I considered going to law school later in life and I went to school relatively close to there.
Logged
JustAnotherExaminer
Senior Member
****
Posts: 167


View Profile
« Reply #3219 on: 11-06-09 at 02:12 am »

Do you work at the office? If so, you should understand. I'm not saying don't have phone interviews...but 90% of the interviews I sit in on with a person that has English as a 2nd, 3rd, etc. language end up getting nowhere. Most of the time the attorney goes, "could you please repeat that?" Then the examiner will repeat and the attorney will think it's rude to ask the examiner to repeat again so he just goes onto the next topic. Heck, I don't understand them half of the time and I speak with them on a weekly basis.

I've also noticed something very odd...in general, people who speak poor English also have a method of getting around answering hard questions...they make less sense. As soon as a hard question arises it is like their English becomes 2x worse. They just start spitting out random keywords relating to the Art and hope the attorney gets frazzled.   


This tactic is also used by Examiners who speak English as a first language.  They start blurting out paragraph and line numbers too quickly for anyone to follow.  They do this for several minutes, and occassionally the attorney will interject with a question or a reference to the exact claim language, to which the Examiner will respond with more rapid-fire paragraph and figure numbers.  After about 3 to 5 minutes of this the Examiner then says "Ok, I can see we aren't going to come to an agreement on this issue, I suggest we move on or end the interview."

If your interviews consist of making examiners point to columns, lines, or figures, you're doing it wrong.
Logged
Examinerguy
Full Member
***
Posts: 83


View Profile Email
« Reply #3220 on: 11-06-09 at 08:07 am »

The attrition rate was astronomical because people were working there and then lateraling out to the legal industry, either as agents or attorneys. A lot of the young examiners I ran into there were either "in law school" or "applying to law school" or "leaving because they graduated law school and got hired by a patent firm." It was rampant and it seemed like common knowledge that turnover was due to defection rather than burnout.

You make a really good point about most jobs not paying that well the first year out and I honestly don't have a good answer for you there. I suspect the reason is that college students are largely unaware of the USPTO's existence, let alone the pay rate. I know I never heard of it before I considered going to law school later in life and I went to school relatively close to there.


I don't think the attrition rate was due to people moving into the legal industry. But I can't prove that by anything else but the conversations I had with those who had left. And to my second point, the 75K thing was meant to portray the fact that the pay doesn't even keep the new examiners there...not that the pay should bring attention to the job.

If your interviews consist of making examiners point to columns, lines, or figures, you're doing it wrong.

Not really sure what you're getting at, but I expect very little of column, line number stuff. I want examiners to understand the applicants argument and give a clear answer.
« Last Edit: 11-06-09 at 08:11 am by Examinerguy » Logged
xephay
Junior Member
**
Posts: 14


View Profile
« Reply #3221 on: 11-06-09 at 08:24 am »

Speaking from my relatively limited experience at the PTO, I'd say that they do have a pretty large body of fluent English speakers in the examiner corps, many of whom are first or 2nd generation immigrants. That being said, they have a surprisingly large body of people that just plain do not speak English. We're not talking about "your accent is difficult to understand over the phone" so much as "it is impossible to have even a semi-confusing conversation with you because you don't know enough basic vocabulary to complete an ordinary sentence without choking"

I ended up drawing pictures and using keywords to explain what i was talking about but mostly I did my best to avoid those people in favor of intermediaries. God forbid you are stuck with them as an examiner for your application.

Granted, English isn't my first or even second language, but I still like to make fun of the Examiner Corps. I don't consider mild or moderate accent to be a problem, but some folks over there sound and write like they've just enrolled in the Aprenda inglés section of the local community college.  Consider this - to get a job in the PTO you must be a US citizen.  To become a US citizen, you must hold a green card for at least 5 years. Given that it takes many years to obtain a green card, it would be fair to assume that most foreign-born Examiners start at the PTO after they've lived in the US for at least 10 years, probably a lot more than that.  And yet, some of them speak and write as if they just came off the boat. 

Seems to me that the PTO should simply enforce a fairly high language fluency standard when hiring.  We are really in the business of "wordsmithing," so why should the fate of our patent applications depend on those who often can't seem to grasp all the intricacies of the English language?  The presence of such folks in the PTO (albeit often exaggerated outside the PTO) still reflects poorly on the Corps.    

I don't disagree with the assessment that there're examiners with English difficulties at the USPTO.  My comment was directed to the generalizations and exaggerations in this anonymous, public forum, in particular the ridiculous statement that equates people not having English as their first language to unfluent English speakers on the phone.  And tech_spec proved my point, if his spoken English is as good as his written English.   Smiley


1.) Because overall they don't complain as much as American's do (at least not in our language  Grin).
2.) They have a much better work ethic (on average).
3.) Some of them have relatives in their home country that they support and send money to so they take the job more seriously.
4.) 98% of the day you don't need to speak english.

There is a reason why the majority of SPE's and primarys are foreigners (many who I cannot hold an understandable conversation with). Most Americans quit after a few years because it is more stressful than regular engineering jobs. Don't get me wrong, I would love a fluent english speaking corps for the sake of the attorneys. However there would either have to be a hefty increase in salaries or a doubling in production...because I don't see them replacing a few thousand poorly spoken foreigners with American engineering graduates anytime soon.

See how many such mis-statements you can find in the above?  Here's one:

... a few thousand poorly spoken foreigners with American engineering graduates anytime soon.

"a few thousand"?  Out of some 6000+ examiners?  No wonder the USPTO is in such a crisis!

And what's a "foreigner"?  Don't you have to be an American to work at the USPTO?  About a month ago the press was claiming "Americans" having won certain Nobel prizes despite those "Americans" having been born in Australia or China.  Is the governor of Calif. a foreigner?  How about the USPTO Director Kappos?  And the Secretary of Commerce, Kappos's boss?  Both have parents or grandparent who were immigrants.

There're several stereotyping opinions in the above that're not worth to time to respond, especially "count Monday" is coming.
Logged
Jim_W
Full Member
***
Posts: 68


View Profile
« Reply #3222 on: 11-06-09 at 12:24 pm »

An "American" who hasn't yet bothered to learn English is still a foreigner.
Logged
tech_spec
Senior Member
****
Posts: 289


View Profile
« Reply #3223 on: 11-06-09 at 12:56 pm »

An "American" who hasn't yet bothered to learn English is still a foreigner.

Well, it gets harder after a certain age to learn a new language, so it's not like "you don't bother" to learn it - you just might not be able to learn it well enough for the patent examining job. The issue is not about being foreign or American.  The issue is that the PTO should only hire examiners that have both the technical knowledge and also adequately-developed English communications skills for the job.  I know, easier said than done.
Logged
DogDayPM
Senior Member
****
Posts: 491



View Profile
« Reply #3224 on: 11-06-09 at 01:22 pm »

Well, it gets harder after a certain age to learn a new language, so it's not like "you don't bother" to learn it - you just might not be able to learn it well enough for the patent examining job.

Nonsense.

If I can pick up Gibberish in my 40's, anyone can do it.

 Grin
Logged

Any and all disclaimers you may see on this forum used by members more experienced and/or smarter than I, are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Pages: 1 ... 210 211 212 213 214 [215] 216 217 218
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 5.094 seconds with 18 queries.