Just joined up and the forum seems to have a lot of good information. Thought I'd see if there was any insight on my marketability to be an examiner based on my background. Its a bit useless, as I have a PhD in Physics with research in Astronomy, involving a lot of programming, digital image analysis, etc. I've been told by current and past examiners that they like to hire physicists as we, allegedly, have a broad skillset. However, I'm guessing that a B.S. with an EE or CE degree would perhaps be higher placed than my PhD in Physics. What say you folks? Any opinions? Thanks!
Most of the hiring seems to be EE/CE. You still have a chance, but don't forget that PTO HR are simple folk. They like brightline tests. I'd play down the astronomy stuff and play up everything else. Go through the list of AUs (
http://www.uspto.gov/patents/resources/classification/art/index.jsp) and see which ones you could possibly work in. Maybe include those as an objective in the resume (so HR won't have to think) or at least mention them in an interview if you're able to get one.