Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
Due to spam with have restricted the number of posts of our members.
We will be doing a complete update to the website shortly, including new hardware and software.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: TM Specimine and use in commerce for a product - Website  (Read 988 times)
BobRoberts
Senior Member
****
Posts: 373


View Profile
« on: 03-10-10 at 10:17 am »

My understanding is that a website will constitute "use in commerce" for a product, provided
the website shows the Mark used as a valid trademark,
close to a picture of the goods,
provides an online order means or a telephone number where the product can be ordered, and
the seller has the means to ship the product over state lines.
-This would be independent of any actual local/intrastate sales.

My understanding is that a website can be used as a specimine provided
the website shows the Mark used as a valid trademark,
close to a picture of the goods, and
provides an online order means or a telephone number where the product can be ordered.


Are these understandings correct?

Thanks
Logged
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: 03-10-10 at 01:31 pm »

A website can act as "point of sale" materials provided there is a mechanism for actually selling on the website.  Search for the Dell case in the TTAB (or Fed Cir?) on this.

Remember, though, that the goods have to be put into (or otherwise affect) interstate commerce before there is a use.  That doesn't mean the website has to "have the means to ship the product over state lines," but the product has to have been.

- Jeff
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
Marke
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 03-10-10 at 05:35 pm »

Note that a website specimen need not necessarily have a picture of the goods.  See In re Sones, 93 U.S.P.Q.2d 1118, 1123 (Fed. Cir. 2009) ("[W]e hold that a picture is not a mandatory requirement for a website-based specimen of use, and that the test for an acceptable website-based specimen, just as any other specimen, is simply that it must in some way evince that the mark is 'associated' with the goods and serves as an indicator of source.").

http://www.cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions/09-1140.pdf
Logged
JSonnabend
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 3657


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: 03-11-10 at 06:49 am »

Marke, that's an interesting case.  Thanks for posting the information on it (I've never had an issue of lack of an image, but it's good to have the case in the back pocket for future use).

- Jeff
Logged

SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
BobRoberts
Senior Member
****
Posts: 373


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: 03-11-10 at 08:35 am »

Thanks Jeff and Marke...

I'll look at those two cases...
Logged
Marke
Junior Member
**
Posts: 25


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: 03-11-10 at 06:06 pm »

My pleasure, guys.
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.385 seconds with 16 queries.