Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: A better way of doing the same  (Read 961 times)

Billy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
A better way of doing the same
« on: 01-25-05 at 01:23 pm »

Hi there,

I have a question about patents. Without giving away my invention, I'll use another example to illustrate:

For example, if you invented a car that doesn't run on wheels but on something else that is existing, like a jet engine or something, is this device patenable? (Combining two existing technology)

Or, like in the optical mouse example, if you invented the "optical mouse" but it does the same thing as the regular mouse, is that patenable? I realize there are more than one company making this type of mouse, so I wondered.

Thanks for any help.
A Poor Inventor.
Billy
Logged

Billy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: A better way of doing the same
« Reply #1 on: 01-25-05 at 01:41 pm »

Furthermore, if the "improvement" was based on something currently patented, how big an issue will it cause? (Its a massive improvement)?

Thanks.
Logged

JSonnabend

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3671
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: A better way of doing the same
« Reply #2 on: 01-26-05 at 12:28 pm »

Most patents consist of improvements to existing technologies.  Very few are "pioneer" patents, such as the airplane.

You may receive a patent for a novel, non-obvious combination of existing technologies.

- Jeff
Logged
SonnabendLaw
Intellectual Property and Technology Law
Brooklyn, USA
718-832-8810
JSonnabend@SonnabendLaw.com
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 17 queries.