Hi all,
I'm searching for a little bit of advice as to whether becoming a patent agent or attorney is a good career path for me. I love science/technology, I enjoy writing and working with people, and I believe my entire skill set is well suited to the patent agent/attorney career (I'm not really the laboratory type). On the other hand though, the thought of working more than 50-60 hours/week terrifies me and I'm not sure I'm cut out for the long hours and general unhappiness that seems to pervade the attorney career.
Background: B.S. EE (graduating June 2010) from UCSB; GPA: 3.38
Experience: EE R&D internship doing printed circuit board (PCB) design
Goals: No more than 50 hours/week (an occasional 60/hr week wouldn't kill me), ~$100k (more would obviously be nice, if possible), and the ability to work somewhat regular hours.
I'd say I'm extremely interested in the attorney career path, but I can't envision myself being happy while regularly working over 50-60 hours/week - I don't mind putting in more than 40, but 60 is out of my league. At the same time, I'm not sure I can justify being a patent agent for the rest of my life when I could easily become a patent attorney and boost my salary (and job security and prestige, I imagine) - I'm just 21 years old, so my obligations at this point are still minimal and the near future would be the best time for law school if I were to go.
I've been quietly reading these forums for a while, and it seems that an in-house patent attorney might be a happy medium between the two extremes - but for the salary of an in-house attorney, is it even worth getting the law degree (as opposed to making a career out of an agent)? Does an in-house attorney make $100k (in CA)?
Graduation is in sight, and I'm struggling to figure out what the best route to take is: Industry experience? Patent bar? Law school? I know I posed alot of questions, but I'd greatly appreciate any insight anyone might have!