Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
Due to spam with have restricted the number of posts of our members.
We will be doing a complete update to the website shortly, including new hardware and software.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Suspension of examination by the PTO  (Read 423 times)
khazzah
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 1559


View Profile WWW
« on: 11-09-09 at 10:06 am »

While reviewing a file wrapper, I ran across something that I've never heard of: an Examiner suspending examination for 6 months because "a reference relevant to the examination of this application may be available".

Specifically allowed by CFR 1.103, although no details are given in the rule. Discussed a little bit in MPEP 709. Another reason for suspension is possible interference, which makes perfect sense to me. But "reference may become available" ?

Any idea what the intention behind this is?
Logged

Karen Hazzah
Patent Prosecution Blog
http://allthingspros.blogspot.com/

Information provided in this post is not legal advice and does not create any attorney-client relationship.
JimIvey
Forum Moderator
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 5415



View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: 11-09-09 at 10:43 am »

I've never seen anything like that.  The only thing that comes to mind is that examiners have access to information we don't and might know when certain art will be available. 

For example, suppose the examiner has a nifty 102 reference that is a pending application that won't publish for another 6 months.  If the examiner allows the case because the reference is not yet available under 102(e), the claim(s) would be invalid (in the examiner's opinion) eventually -- assuming publication of the application in question is an eventuality.  Not a great option.  So, waiting for the reference might make some sense.

That would be my guess.  If it's your application, you can always call the examiner and ask what's going on. 

If the application in question has foreign or PCT priority, it might have sibling cases that are published and already available as prior art and you can suggest the examiner look for those to get your case moving again.  Of course, only the examiner would know about that priority on extra-US cases.

Regards.
Logged

--
James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
http://www.iveylaw.com
Friends don't let friends file provisional patent applications.
klaviernista
Lead Member
*****
Posts: 1716



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: 11-09-09 at 11:10 am »

One possible scenario is that the examiner has identified a foreign language reference that has an interesting English abstract, but which is in a language that the PTO translators cannot translate.  The PTO has to provide a translation of any foreign language reference, so the suspension is probably for the purpose of providing time to obtain the translation.

This is a rare scenario, becuase the PTO translations branch is generally very good.  I remember walking down to that branch several times for a spot translation and being amazed when I learned that one translator could fluently read and speak 8 entirely different languages - Russian, French, Portugese, Japanese, Chinese (Mandarin), English, German, and Dutch. 
Logged

This post is not legal advice.  I am not your attorney.  You rely on anything I say at your own risk. If you want to reach me directly, send me a PM through the board.  I do not check the email associated with my profile often.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.486 seconds with 19 queries.