
I just wanted to see if I changed tact, whether you'd do same, or ignore me. Its raining here, the kids are all home from school so I'm not going to get any work done anyhow. Internet forums unfortunately do not by their nature permit full communicative interaction, and some writings can be subject to different interpretations. I've noticed on some internet forums where people post anonymously, that they get pretty wild at times, sometimes taking out their own frustrations. It's probably got some therapeutic value for some.
I posted, as you correctly wrote, about "buffer" and "power", only to bring up the possibility of the use of terms other than "first", "third", along with defining what is meant by the terms one chooses to employ, in the spec. The OP was having trouble with terms "first", "third" etc. and I merely suggested they consider doing something different. Whats the issue with that, that makes you want to grill me on the use of "functional" language ? It is possible to use my suggestion without using functional language in the claims, is it not ? Adjectives aren't necessarily functional, only descriptive of a noun and that description can be whatever the lexicographer wants it to be. Open up.... use your imagination.
I bet we could still be buddies, as I don't know you from one anonymous person or any other, and I don't have any ill will towards anyone on the planet, except the enemies of the united States, foreign and domestic. I apologized because it is not my intention to upset anyone, and to the extent I did, my apology stands. In communicating, I believe it is the person doing the talking's responsibility to see to it that the information they convey is conveyed in sufficient detail that his audience
receives the message. I thought in the present instance that this would be the case, but by my own human imperfection now realize that my communication was not sufficiently complete for all to understand, hence the explanation above. I'd just use words other than "first" and "third" - that's it !! And functional language may or may not be appropriate depending on the case, the prior art, and the goals of the Applicant. Cheers !!