Intellectual Property Forum
Intellectual Property Forum Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.  
News:
Due to spam with have restricted the number of posts of our members.
We will be doing a complete update to the website shortly, including new hardware and software.
We are sorry for the inconvenience.

 
   Main Forum Page   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Length of copyright?  (Read 1450 times)
leupi
Newbie
*
Posts: 2


« on: 11-09-09 at 08:57 pm »

How long does copyright last on recorded music? I have heard anywhere from 50 years to 95 years. My assumption was 50 years for recorded music.

I am also wondering about books. I have heard that it is the life of the author plus 70 years. Is this correct?

Song lyrics? If you write a song, how long is the copyright on that? I heard that 'Happy Birthday to You' is still copyright protected, urban myth or truth?

Thanks
Logged
mactheknife
Senior Member
****
Posts: 194



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: 11-10-09 at 06:19 am »

First off, it depends what country you're in.  I believe the 50 years rule for recordings is British (someone help me out here?) and record labels keep trying to extend it.

Here in the U.S., the default rule for anything (books, music, recordings, paintings, etc.) created after 1/1/1978 is life of the author plus 70 years.  However, for "works made for hire" (which, according to record labels, most sound recordings are) the copyright term is 95 years from publication or 120 years from creation.  However, there are so many permutations from the default that the Cornell University law school has created this handy chart.

Also remember that there is a difference between the "recording" and the "music" (and lyrics) that is recorded.

As to whether Happy Birthday to You is still under copyright: the answer is that ASCAP keeps collecting royalties on it.  I happen to believe that it is in the public domain.  A scholarly article about this is here but my more simple explanation is that (1) the differences between it and the public domain song "Good Morning to All" are so insubstantial such as to not warrant separate copyright protection and (2) the "copyrighted" version of the song contains an improper publication date in the copyright notice which would put it in the public domain automatically.  See here for background.
« Last Edit: 11-10-09 at 06:24 am by mactheknife » Logged
Kaitlin
Senior Member
****
Posts: 693


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: 11-10-09 at 08:06 am »

Liked your succinct answer and references, Mac.  Interesting, the one article's suggestion to bring adverse possession principles to the new long-term copyrights.
« Last Edit: 11-10-09 at 08:09 am by Kaitlin » Logged

This post is an off-the-cuff musing and should not be misconstrued as legal advice. THERE IS NO ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN US. Proper legal advice requires full disclosure of facts-not appropriate to a public forum-and attorney research time and effort which has not been expended here.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC
Page created in 0.407 seconds with 18 queries.