Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Jp]

Before 7 years goes by, I'd like to find an attorney that has an interest in my case.

I feel that I was victimized by Textron Financial Corporation a company of Bell Helicopter.

Bell Makes Helmets and helicopters, I divulged a Helmet Technology and Helicopter Equipment to them in good faith, as I was informed by them that an in hoiuse counselor would review my business plan, when it came time to refinance, the company would not answer my communications fax, telephone or email,
this went on for three months, then crdit failure set in.

I really believed that, they thought, I would not figure out what was going on and that I would blame myself for the failure, but if you are a forthright and good attorney, we can go as far as the Defence department contracting, Coast Guard, and Homeland Security, the technologies are suppose to be important advancements therefore there should be questions and answers, I am also willing to take on an attorney and write up some terms of a separate venue concerning developing technologies, . . however I am interested in the damages to my credit, 150,000 and 100,000 sweat equity, and what Myself and my family endured for the time after this happened, etc,, I can tell you,
I want punitive retribution.

If you are interested in taking on Textron Financial for a settlement I am willing to talk turkey with you.

Please have a look at the helmet technology here;
http://rotorheadforums.com/index.php?topic=146.0

I really believe that these Defense Department Contractors play funny games,
with politicians, its up to you attorneys to keep us free, Young Americans have always given their lives, so that you could become a law student have a decent life, and preserve liberty and freedom.How about it !

Please Reply, . . .
Contact me : Jp





 

[klaviernista]

Do you have a patent on the technology in question?  Regardless, did you have a confidentiality agreement in place with the contractors you spoke with?

[Jp]

The point is they led me to believe that I could confer with a business consultant, whom I spoke to once,(over the phone), and sent the business plan to, it was early on and the business plan had to be revamped. I was never able to reconnect to him do to the fact that they did not answer again in the ways I have explained. My position is that if the proposed technology is of value, and a search of resources in the procurement area of Defense, Homeland Security, Coast Guard, etc. would yield no sources, then it would be clear for me to move forward, if this were not the case, then I would want to investigate further to see if Bell Helicopter is connected in any way to a funding proposal. If there were, then I would want to challenge the fairness, etc.

My stand is the practice was unfair and I am would like to approach this from a federal fair credit, and practices of financial nature across a state line.

If an attorney would represent me and a search conducted would reveal nothing than I would have the opportunity to restart the business from the stand point that an improvement in the two equipments that I am developing can be bought forward in some way.

It is not a point of Property rights as I see it it is a point of handling property rights, for example theft by deception.

No, I did not have a confidential agreement with Textron of Bell, but they came to me in the first place by acquiring my previous credit line, they proposed to have an interest in small businesses. I submitted a business plan and developments of the technologies I was working on. This is a way that one can discuss the financial possibilities that are necessary to consider the costs of development.

One of the things I want help with is, how can I find out how the government, would learn that there are technologies that need to be researched in order to have the advantages that those technologies would provide, this would lay the ground work for a lot of unanswered question to get answered.

What essential life saving technologies that are, "thee" needed ones, and does is government aware of them and if they are what is their view point on why they do not have them!

If your going to tell me I can't do anything about it, go right ahead, but when you do something that is deceptive and you utilize federal byways, you have committed a crime, it is only a matter of proving it.

Secondly, I don't need a patent to procure R&D support in China, which I am looking into.

Thirdly, I can always develop a Japanese patent, if I can find some Japanese industry who is willing to back it.

I am P.O'ed. about the negligence if not the criminal negligence on the part of Textron of Bell, and I will deter any profits they would have regardless of their rights, I'll become there competitor.

I got knocked off balance because I was unaware of deception, I did not get knocked out!

My friend I am a firm believer in, "Where there is a will there is a way."

I don't plan on whimpering out as the looser or the fall guy.

[klaviernista]

Hi JP.  Thanks for the clarification.  I hope that my prior comments did not come off as belittling your situation or as implying that there is no action you can take.  I just wanted to see if there was a particular IP right involved.  Most of the posters on this forum are  IP attorneys, students, patent examiners, or inventors.  If IP rights were involved in your situation, I think you would be in the right place to look for assistance.  But given the facts you have provided, I'm not sure you are asking the right pool of attorneys.

You might want to look for an attorney that specializes in government contracts, unfair business practices, and/or civil/criminal fraud.  They will probably be able to better advise you on the action you can take.

Best of luck to you.

Klav

[Jp]

You have something there, as a matter of fact I did get what I thought was the run around from one fraud investigative office the U.S.Attorney, the first one told me he reported my facts to the appropriate office many times I asked which that was, but never found out, I then pressed and found out that that particular, U.S. Attorney was not in that office any longer, and it was also very vague as to where his records were, then finally and this was after a year, they told me maybe I should try the FBI, I then asked if that was it and pressed a little, and found out there is Defense criminal investigation I queried them as to the process never got an answer, . . .

Do you think I could approach those lawyers you referred to with the proposal of,
whats the word I'm looking for , continuation or something? sorry it slipped my mind.

[GeratorZer]

One of the things I wish advice with is, how can I acquisition out how the government, would apprentice that there are technologies that charge to be researched in adjustment to accept the advantages that those technologies would provide, this would lay the arena plan for a lot of changing catechism to get answered.


________________
Thermostat

[Jp]

One of the things I wish advice with is, how can I acquisition out how the government, would apprentice that there are technologies that charge to be researched in adjustment to accept the advantages that those technologies would provide, this would lay the arena plan for a lot of changing catechism to get answered.


________________
Thermostat

I would like to understand your questions, . . . so let me ask the meaning of your choice of words so I may better understand the question, . .

. . . how can I acquisition out how the government,

What is it you are seeking ?
Do you want to know, . . how you can find out what it is that the government wants to acquire ?
 

would apprentice that there are technologies that charge to be researched in adjustment to accept the advantages that those technologies would provide,

If you are asking what advantages are there that concern new technologies that the government has excepted for development, and what advantages still can be developed, you would first have to have a knowledge of what they have accepted,

The governments process for acquiring new technologies is daunting to me and as far as I am concerned very inefficient.

The ideal situation would be for each office or department that they would have a disclosure policy, for example like the one that the National Institute of Standards and Technology had in the Office of Energy Related Inventions,
This Office, the O.E.R.I. is now closed, defunct, (done away with), (is not there any more).

However they had a form 1019, that allowed someone with an idea, a concept, an invention, to submit it for an evaluation, when you did so, they sent you a receipt, and then their board reviewed your submission, and then they sent you an evaluation, allowing the process to progress, and allowing you to respond to it.

These days the system is set up to pass technologies to large corporations and do away with you.

The best I can advise you, is to document your technology, then do as much research as possible to find out what is out there in the world that will compare to it.

Then you must find out what the government is doing with that technology, the thing is they may not even know that they need a new technology in the field that you have.

In this case you are in for the trial of your life.

I myself have this case and it is a merry go round, of what I believe is Big Corporation, Big Government and Big Brother. Plainly, you have to outsmart them to get your pay check for your justly deserved work.

[Kaitlin]

Hi JP:

Please... Please... Please...
Listen to a former litigator:

You do not want to put real facts of your case out in a public forum.
Your opponent will find your post simply by searching their or your name.  (If they're a big business, they may even have counsel regularly trolling the net for references to their name to make sure their trademark isn't being infringed.
Statements you make can come back to haunt you in litigation.  If you say anything which goes against your interest, it can be brought in as evidence against you.

Moreover, any theories of your case are "out there" for the other side to consider.  When you discuss litigation in private with your attorney, your discussion comes under the attorney-client privilege.

It is possible to go back and modify your post -- I'd suggest you do that to remove those specific references which could be used to identify yourself, your potential opponent, or your products.
I'm pleased to see none of your specifics seem to be repeated in the replies, so I think all that's needed is for you to go back and purge your own posts.

[cris2per]

You can try tampa attorneys

[Jp]

First of all, . . Thanks Kaitlin for your advice, your time and efforts are not un-noticed, . .

I am still suffering the consequences of this, . . I still have very serious creditors pursuing me. One interesting fact is that I did contact  the

Technical Industrial Liaison Office, at the

PROGRAM EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR ROTARY WING, which is located at the

United States Special Operations Command.

I asked the simple question does this technology exist and or is it a subject that the Defense Department would have an interest in ?

I did this through the Receptionist/Secretary, who answered the request.

The response from TILO  was can you give us a little more detail, since at first, I gave a brief description, I replied with a bit more information.

That was I guess, at least a year, possibly two, .  although, I made several

attempts, requesting a reply, I have never heard from them. Notta!

The same thing happened when I spent a year contacting and presenting the

facts to the inspector generals office, regarding, fraudulent practices involving a financial matter etc.

Hey, ! that's the way the gov works !


I believe I posted this in another thread;


Recently I had the Opportunity to make a submission to the EPA concerning the Oil Spill and a possible solution.
It is, for all intended purposes, would concern a technology R&D, . . the same one that I made twenty-one years ago, a net having small sizes net loops, (screening), and capable over sized booms.
I received enthusiasm and coverage from the local news paper.

I intended to send it to the EPA but at the time of the Valdez Spill the Government elected for oil-spill technology to go to the Marine
Spill Response Corporation, (MSRC), instead of going to the Office of Environmental Protection.

The concept was a net that was small enough in net loop size, (screening), that it would hold the partiality
buoyant crude. The flotation booms were designed to be much over sized and would protect the contents from leaving the
seine during rough seas. It would have been deployed using it in such a way that in would open and engulf or surround large
amounts of oil, then holding it in one place, acting as a pumping station.

The MSRC rejected the idea, and when I asked why, they told me that they did not have to answer that.
Thanks Gov for the great opportunity to have a career as a design artist who worked in environmental technologies.


It would sort of look like this;

http://i48.tinypic.com/69gxud.gif

At this late date, if this system were to be used, all that can be done is to make shift a fishing seine, this could be done by over laying the net with a finer mesh.


cris2per, thanks, are you saying Tampa Florida Attorneys ?

If so, may I ask why ?







 

[DogDayPM 9er9er9er]

First of all, . . Thanks Kaitlin for your advice, your time and efforts are not un-noticed, . ....

cris2per, thanks, are you saying Tampa Florida Attorneys ?

If so, may I ask why ?

JP, your year-old thread was resurrected by a spam-bot.

[Jp]

Your Kidding me !!!

Yeah, I'm out of it, .......... Phssssh !

Hey are you that guy, . .  Nash, . . from Miami Vice ?