Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Patent Pros and Lit Under the Same Roof  (Read 1475 times)

TataBox

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 696
    • View Profile
Patent Pros and Lit Under the Same Roof
« on: 03-02-09 at 03:30 pm »

Are there any downsides to having everything under the same roof, meaning your patent prosecuted and litigated under the same roof?

Regards,

Logged

ababab

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 103
    • View Profile
Re: Patent Pros and Lit Under the Same Roof
« Reply #1 on: 03-24-09 at 04:23 pm »


Are there any downsides to having everything under the same roof, meaning your patent prosecuted and litigated under the same roof?


The old line (commonly invoked by lit-only shops vying for a pros-lit firm's client) is that the original pros firm would/could be conflicted during the litigation. 

The theory went like this:
Every defendant alleges IE. 
Which means the prosecuting atty will have to testify. 
Which means he can't be an effective advocate as well as a witness.
Which means his partners can't be effective advocates either.

A new theory has emerged since the role of IE in most patent lit has shrunk to microscopic proportions, and since counsel & judges have learned how to handle the supposed conflicts.

The new theory is much simpler:
Those guys sort of know how to get a patent for you, but if they really knew how to litigate patents they wouldn't still be writing them.
We don't write them (unless our big clients insist), we just litigate them.
We can do it for twice the price and with much more glamor, so give us the work.

The new theory usually works.



Logged

klaviernista

  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1752
    • View Profile
    • Email
Re: Patent Pros and Lit Under the Same Roof
« Reply #2 on: 03-27-09 at 05:37 am »

Ababab is right in that all defendant allege inequitable conduct, which means that the prosecuting attorney will have to testify.  This can create issues, because the internal prosecution files may be considered privileged, and the proseucting attorney may be barred from looking at them (see the recent Golden Hour decision in the ED of Texas, where this exact problem came up).

That said, my firm has substantial prosecution and litigation practices, and in many instances, we handle both sides for the same client.  I'm sure there are internal issues that have to be worked out (setting up Chinese walls, etc.), but I have never heard of our firm turning down a litigation for something as generic as the fact that we also handle the client's prosecution work.

Logged
This post is not legal advice.  I am not your attorney.  You rely on anything I say at your own risk. If you want to reach me directly, send me a PM through the board.  I do not check the email associated with my profile often.
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.077 seconds with 16 queries.