Intellectual Property Forum The Intellectual Property Forum

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

The forum software has been upgraded.  New registrations are not currently permitted while we iron out any bugs and other matters.  Please report any problems you find.

Author Topic: Is there any use to patent a website?  (Read 1385 times)

Santoro

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Is there any use to patent a website?
« on: 02-27-09 at 10:18 pm »

I have an idea for a matchmaking website but i was wondering if i should patent it. I think that patenting a website is possible but if somebody wants to copy it, it's hard to prove they stole your patent as they can do enough modifications ot make it look different. For exemple even facebook was stolen from another website source code and they are still in court for that?

What do you think, is there any use to patent my website?

Thanks
Logged

Hank66

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: Is there any use to patent a website?
« Reply #1 on: 03-01-09 at 12:04 pm »

You can't patent a website (maybe trademark the name), but you can patent specific underlying algorithms and methods (let's say method for matchmaking..storing user's physical location info at matchmaking server, alerting user when match within 1 mile radius etc).

You should also consider how easy it is to design-around your invention. This sort of ideas are typically easy to design around as there is plenty of prior art.
Logged

JimIvey

  • Forum Moderator
  • Lead Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5413
    • View Profile
    • IveyLaw -- Turning Caffeine into Patents(sm)
Re: Is there any use to patent a website?
« Reply #2 on: 03-02-09 at 12:35 pm »

I'd add that, to the extent your user interface of your web site is a non-trivial deviation from what's been done/described publicly before, you can also patent your user interface (which can be pretty close to patenting your web site).

You might look into copyright protection as well.

Regards.
Logged
--
James D. Ivey
Law Offices of James D. Ivey
http://www.iveylaw.com
Friends don't let friends file provisional patent applications.

ChrisWhewell

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
    • View Profile
    • Searches, spec writing, prosecution & other deeds.
    • Email
Re:
« Reply #3 on: 03-04-09 at 06:32 am »

I'd model at least one set of claims after State Street's patent, directed to a system.  Lots of folks erroneously believe that case was about a "business method", but if one really really really looks at it, it's found to actually a machine-type claim.

In my "business method" cases, I claim systems - first data processing module + computer memory + microprocessor + etc. , wherein the system is .........    If one goes to monster.com I believe there's a patent number posted there, which could provide stimulating reading.

Gregg Stobbs (Harness, Dickey, and Pierce ?) wrote a nice book on "business method" patents.
   
Logged
Chris Whewell
www.mypatentagent.com
Notice:   NOTHING IN THIS MESSAGE SHALL BE CONSTRUED AS LEGAL ADVICE.  No representations or warranties are made with respect to any of the information contained in this message, and particularly in reference to its accuracy or suitability for any purpose.
 



Footer

www.intelproplaw.com

Terms of Use
Feel free to contact us:
Sorry, spam is killing us.

iKnight Technologies Inc.

www.intelproplaw.com

Page created in 0.174 seconds with 18 queries.