|
|
Examiner Using Prior Art As Tool Box
|
gee
|
1
|
1051
|
04-22-07 at 08:24 pm
by Bill Richards
|
|
|
|
Unexpected Results - work by others?
|
bluesky
|
0
|
904
|
04-03-07 at 02:06 pm
by bluesky
|
|
|
|
about the meanings of "obvious" in 103
|
caoxiong81
|
1
|
1097
|
03-17-07 at 07:21 pm
by Isaac
|
|
|
|
Modifying a secondary reference, proper?
|
Roberto J Rios
|
0
|
869
|
03-14-07 at 01:30 pm
by Roberto J Rios
|
|
|
|
Defence in Depth
|
Bob's Uncle
|
4
|
1301
|
01-03-07 at 02:16 pm
by BH
|
|
|
|
Overcoming 103(a) rejection
|
Bob's Uncle
|
2
|
3178
|
12-29-06 at 03:11 pm
by ChrisWhewell
|
|
|
|
when something non-obvious turns obvious quickly
|
Timothy Davenport
|
1
|
1194
|
12-12-06 at 01:40 pm
by JimIvey
|
|
|
|
Unexpected Results rebuttal
|
JJQ
|
1
|
1208
|
12-05-06 at 03:11 pm
by Bill Richards
|
|
|
Single-reference obviousness rejections
|
thepatentguy
|
10
|
2907
|
12-05-06 at 08:13 am
by Isaac
|
|
|
|
millions of dollars based on obviousness
|
peter beechey
|
1
|
1096
|
10-03-06 at 04:45 am
by Wiscagent
|
|
|
|
New Usage
|
JodiB
|
1
|
1162
|
09-28-06 at 08:03 am
by JimIvey
|
|
|
|
How simple can a patent be?
|
Peter Beechey
|
9
|
1910
|
09-17-06 at 09:11 pm
by Wiscagent
|
|
|
|
In re Chu
|
Brian
|
8
|
1861
|
09-16-06 at 07:34 pm
by biopico
|
|
|
|
How to determine if a patent is obvious
|
ced_dude
|
8
|
2964
|
09-12-06 at 12:12 pm
by Bill Richards
|
|
|
|
Patent issued on an idea taught in 1960's patent?
|
tryingtofile
|
2
|
1254
|
07-31-06 at 08:33 pm
by JimIvey
|
|
|
|
similar product
|
S
|
1
|
1074
|
07-26-06 at 06:08 pm
by Wiscagent
|
|
|
|
obvious arguments
|
Mike Lonel
|
4
|
1650
|
07-04-06 at 06:23 am
by eric stasik
|
|
|
|
USPTOs position on the obviousness standard
|
Isaac
|
3
|
1581
|
07-02-06 at 12:04 pm
by Isaac
|
|
|
|
A in view of B makes it obvious?
|
Larry Stell
|
2
|
1385
|
05-05-06 at 09:41 am
by TataBox
|
|
|
|
102(a)
|
russell
|
5
|
1607
|
03-16-06 at 07:05 am
by Isaac
|
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 replies)
Locked Topic
Sticky Topic
Poll