|
|
New Use for Old Item Question
|
HeatherN17
|
2
|
198
|
01-25-13 at 05:11 pm
by khazzah
|
|
|
Help explaining how patent products cant be copied
|
chipsanddip
|
4
|
253
|
02-19-13 at 09:56 pm
by MYK
|
|
|
Newbie question: "inventive step" ruling in international preliminary report
|
rilexa
|
3
|
269
|
11-26-12 at 12:31 pm
by rilexa
|
|
|
Overcoming 103 rejection
|
PolymerAgent
|
2
|
316
|
12-07-12 at 03:01 pm
by PolymerAgent
|
|
|
New U.S. Patent Law - September 2011
|
smcclure
|
0
|
409
|
09-20-11 at 10:20 am
by smcclure
|
|
|
Rebuttal to Rejection based on Combining Prior Art Elements
|
PHInventor
|
4
|
531
|
05-18-12 at 03:45 pm
by JustAnotherExaminer
|
|
|
priority
|
astrojudo
|
0
|
603
|
07-29-10 at 09:44 am
by astrojudo
|
|
|
Declaration under rule 132 exhibits
|
marigny
|
1
|
653
|
04-30-12 at 10:46 am
by JustAnotherExaminer
|
|
|
grace period and obviousness
|
temple
|
3
|
877
|
04-18-12 at 08:41 am
by Oh, Crud
|
|
|
Unexpected Results - work by others?
|
bluesky
|
0
|
987
|
04-03-07 at 02:06 pm
by bluesky
|
|
|
Modifying a secondary reference, proper?
|
Roberto J Rios
|
0
|
1032
|
03-14-07 at 01:30 pm
by Roberto J Rios
|
|
|
Help you to successfully obtain Patent in China
|
bandcnlawyer
|
0
|
1038
|
11-08-07 at 07:01 pm
by bandcnlawyer
|
|
|
overcoming "combination of prior art teachings" --not so obvious seriously
|
silent_thinker
|
4
|
1068
|
10-06-11 at 12:43 pm
by JimIvey
|
|
|
OVERCOMING A IN VIEW OF B
|
patag2001
|
1
|
1087
|
05-14-07 at 12:59 pm
by JimIvey
|
|
|
similar product
|
S
|
1
|
1176
|
07-26-06 at 06:08 pm
by Wiscagent
|
|
|
millions of dollars based on obviousness
|
peter beechey
|
1
|
1184
|
10-03-06 at 04:45 am
by Wiscagent
|
|
|
about the meanings of "obvious" in 103
|
caoxiong81
|
1
|
1195
|
03-17-07 at 07:21 pm
by Isaac
|
|
|
Examiner Using Prior Art As Tool Box
|
gee
|
1
|
1198
|
04-22-07 at 08:24 pm
by Bill Richards
|
|
|
expert above ordinary skil
|
gilteva
|
1
|
1209
|
06-20-07 at 01:17 pm
by pentazole
|
|
|
New Usage
|
JodiB
|
1
|
1244
|
09-28-06 at 08:03 am
by JimIvey
|