Does this need a service mark or a trademark?

Subject: Re: Does this need a service mark or a trademark?

Comments:
: I am working on a website which I plan to use to sell(well, : attempt to sell :-) licenses for the use of digitized : images of photographs. These would be photographs : (mostly nature photography -- plants, flowers, etc) : that I have taken and digitized myself. : Now, reading through the various designations and classes at : http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/doc/gsmanual/manual.html : and http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/tac/tmfaq.htm I am having trouble understanding if I need a service mark or a trademark. "Photographs" and "Photographic prints" are both goods, while the conversion of photographs into digital form, the electronic storage and delivery of photographic images, the leasing of reproduction rights to photographs, and commissioned photography are all services. : So now, if I were merely selling photographic "prints", it would seem to me to require a trademark. If I were reselling licenses to photographs taken by others (e.g. like a stock photography house), it would clearly be a service. : But in my case I would like the mark to apply to both : to the digital manifestation of the photographic image itself *and* the licensing of limited rights to : reproduce the image. : So is this a service, a good, or both? Or is this a stupid question? : Thanks, : --Bob

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.