www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Trademark v. Corporate Name


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Ray Walsh on May 08, 2001 at 11:07:25:

While I practice in patent law, my memory of some particulars of TM law is fuzzy. If someone has a federal TM granted would he potentially be able to stop someone from using a similar name for a valid state corporation/[and/or] sue for damages? The names in question have in fact been confused by consumers and the services do "collide" in the market place. The first use in commerce of the TM predates the date of state incorporation. My sense is that the use of a validly incorporated state corporate name could be infringing under the Lanham Act due to the supremecy clause, and I think there was even a case on point about this in my law school trademark class, but it was too long ago to remember.
Thanks.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Trademark v. Corporate Name

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Trademark Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.



Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Trademark Forum
www.intelproplaw.com