www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
|
Re: Right of Publicity - what constitutes "identity"?[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on October 31, 2003 at 09:53:07: In Reply to: Right of Publicity - what constitutes "identity"? posted by Steve on October 30, 2003 at 14:47:57: : I have read about how the Right of Publicity protects the use of a person's "name" or "likeness". However, everything I've read fails to accurately define those terms. Where is the line drawn at use of a name? For example, if I made a shirt that said: : "We love Michael Jordan" : Then that would obviously be infringing on his Right of Publicity. However, what about: : "We love Jordan" : From what I've read, it seems that last names can still be construed as violating someone's Right of Publicity, even though I could be talking about thousands of different Jordans. OK, so what about: : "We love Mike" : So what about this??? I could literally be talking about any one of a million different Mikes. Could any one of them challenge me for violating his Right of Publicity? : Also, I'm talking about nothing but a blank shirt with text. I would assume that if I put Jordan's number, 23, on the shirt, then that would further clarify which Mike I was talking about and further put me at risk of violating Mr Jordan's Right of Publicity. Correct or not? : Would the rest of my merchandise have any bearing on it? For example, if my place was called "The Name Store" and I had shirts with all kinds of "We love XXXX" shirts, would that be ok, whereas if my store was all Chicago Bulls-related merchandise, it wouldn't, because you could infer from the surrounding items that the Mike I'm referring to was Jordan. It seems almost ridiculous to think that a shirt could be acceptable in one setting but not in another. Is this the case? : If anyone can give me links that clearly explain this, I'd be much appreciative. Dear Steve, M. Arthur Auslander
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Trademark Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |