Re: Re: Re: Proving dilution after Victor's Little Secret

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Proving dilution after Victor's Little Secret

Comments:
: : : : Steven's dealt with the circuit split concerning the standard for federal dilution rather nicely. However, I am somewhat baffled as to how one is now supposed to prove dilution. Steven's argues that in order to succeed on the merits you must show "actual diltuion". However, he turns right around and says that you don't need to show the actual consequences of dilution in order to prove actual dilution. Does anyone have any idea how you can show dilution without showing that it has occured? : : : Dear Mr. Yearry, : : : The question seem to abstract to be able to have clear answer. What is more it looks like an answer might require legal research. : : : M. Arthur Auslander : : : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : : : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463 : : : 718-548-0592, aus@auslander.com : : : ELAINE's Workshop® : : : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™ : : : Reality Check® : : Are you retarded? : Dear Mr.Dover, : Your question is too vauge to answer. : M. Arthur Auslander : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909 : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463 : 7185430266, aus@auslander.com : ELAINE's Workshop® : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™ : Reality Check®

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.