www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: Suspended Trademark Application Letter


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M Arthur Auslander on November 25, 2002 at 00:20:20:

In Reply to: Suspended Trademark Application Letter posted by Dennis K. Sebenick on November 23, 2002 at 14:04:12:

: Hello there,
: I received a letter from the trademark office today indicating that our Trademark could be "confusingly similar" to an existing trademark that is currently in the opposition stage. Our product has been in use since July 1998.

: We had a failed business relationship that screwed up our ability to file the trademark and ended in a lawsuit over the product and the name of the product, which was settled with us as owners of the product and the name. There was a trademark registration in place from early 2000 under a different, but related company name. We were unable to register the trademark during the lawsuit (according to our attorney, and they tried to convince us to just change the name which we didn't want).

: Now during this period there were 3 different companies trying to get a similar trademark, and now there is one left who put their request in 11/2001 and say their first use is 11/2001. Ours was filed 6/2002, and reported in use since 7/1998 (which we have documented proof). W

: My question is what takes precedence, the filing date or the first use date. Also, even though the Service from the other company and the product from our company are in the same industry, they are in my opinion would not be confused as we wouldn't even target the same customers.

: I'm also certain that this company would known of our product as we are very well entrenched on the web, including registration of the website with the same name as the trademark (registered since 1998). Do they have some sort of responsibility to recognize that a product with that name already existed ?

: Any help would be appreciated.

Dear Mr. Sebenick,
The date of first use in the class is critial. You must watout for the incontestability of other registered marks.

M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop®
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™
Reality Check®




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Suspended Trademark Application Letter

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any trademark or any facts relating to your circumstances. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Trademark Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.



Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Trademark Forum
www.intelproplaw.com