www.intelproplaw.com | www.intelproplaw.com |
|
Re: Fair use question.[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Trademark Forum ] [ FAQ ] Posted by Stephen L. Anderson on July 24, 2002 at 19:17:46: In Reply to: Fair use question. posted by Jess Ruffner-Booth on July 16, 2002 at 01:27:05: : If a term is in generic usage to describe a particular type of thing, and somebody registers that term as a trademark, can that trademark owner keep people from using that term in a generic manner? This term has been in generic usage for at least five years before being registered. : Thanks, Depending on the type of goods or service, a trademark can run the gamut from GENERIC, (merely descriptive), suggestive, fanciful, arbitrary or coined. While Steve Jobs' company owns a famous trademark APPLE for computers, it cannot stop farmers from selling Fujis, Granny Smiths and MacIntoshes by use of such generic designation. Here are a few more examples: WAX ON/WAX OFF NAIL ONS might be viewed as suggestive for press-on nails, but if used by one paticular trader for more than 5 years, and/or extensively promoted it could acquire some distinctiveness or public recognition which might lead to trademark protection. Consider: IBM trademark for International Business Machines. My Toshiba laptop manufactured in Taiwan has traveled me with on business to Korea, Hong Kong and back to the US. I suppose I might now fairly describe it as an International Business Machine despite its original manufacturer. Although, BMW has acquired a distinctive trademark: THE ULTIMATE DRIVING MACHINE, many would argue that the description could also be fairly used to describe just about any Ferrari, a Shelby Cobra or even the new Hummer II. For more about descriptive and generic names, and links to recent decisions involving trademarks that were deemed generic for use as domain names, check out www.genericnamesonline.com.
|
www.intelproplaw.com |
The Intellectual Property Law Server Old Trademark Forum |
www.intelproplaw.com |