www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: prior art and non-disclosure


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on November 13, 2003 at 07:35:11:

In Reply to: prior art and non-disclosure posted by Bill on November 13, 2003 at 05:52:28:

:
: Consider this scenario:

: Pretend that there is no Mexico-US co-mingling of cultures. Taco Bell etc. is not in existence.

:
: I, on my own, go to China and eat egg rolls. I come back to the US and I play with the food and independenly invent the burrito, and apply get a provisional patent application. I begin courting McDonald's for a license deal.

: Of course, I have McD sign a non-disclosure agreement. The non-disclosure agreement says I am the one who showed them the burrito and in so many words, own the rights to it (but not really, since it is not patented yet.) A strong non-disclosure agreement would read something like, "I am the one who showed McD the burrito. Before I came along, McD knew nothing about this. Therefore, if McD enters the burrito business, it must be under my license."

: Now, many books suggest having the licensee (McD) pay for the patent lawyers and fees. This makes good sense to me, since I don't have an extra $10,000 right now. These same books also recommend getting the license agreement to say that the licensee (McD) must pay to sue others for infringement. The logic behind this is again, the inventors lack of funds for legal fees.

: I just read another loong article, that said manufacturers typically cease royalties when infringement is discovered. This makes sense, because if the patent is weak, everyone could infringe it, making it almost worthless.

: Question 1:
: The above two points are in conflict. Would a licensee be motivated to write a weak patent, and then cry infringement, and then cease royalties?

: Suppose I get McD to sign a license agreement and they agree to pay for patent fees. I start getting rich.

: In the future, someone goes to Mexico, and it is discovered that there is prior art on my burrito, and Burger King begins selling burritos.

: Question 2:
: Would a non-disclosure really prevent McD from getting into the burrito business? Forever?

: Does anyone have any direct expereince with these issues.
Dear Bill,
It just does not work with the scenario as you have posted it.

M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463
7185430266, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop®
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™
Reality Check®




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: prior art and non-disclosure

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Patent Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Patent Forum
www.intelproplaw.com