www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server www.intelproplaw.com

This forum is no longer operational. Here are the New Forums.

Re: Re: Re: Description+operation


[ The Intellectual Property Law Server ]
[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Patent Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by M. Arthur Auslander on April 01, 2003 at 21:58:40:

In Reply to: Re: Re: Description+operation posted by in the know on April 01, 2003 at 07:18:43:

: You really are a shameless plug arent you Auslander...

: You're a bottom feeding attorney who is intimidating inventors here as a means to get customers... pathetic.

: C'mon, people, speak up, this guy wont give you any advice, he just wants your money, he has no business on this board!!!
: If he wants to advertise he should register himself with the yellow pages or run commercials of the "used car salesperson" variety!!

: AS for the gentleman lookign to write up a specification, here's a sound piece of advice for you, find a patent in your same field and study how it the specification is setup, plug in your material, and emulate. When it comes to claims though, get yourself an agent or attorney.
: : : Okay, I need advice. I am writing up a patent and I need to know if I should include in my patent application the description of the invention plus the operation description seperately. I have noticed that in the majority of the patent applications I look at, that they combine both the description and operation description in the same section under description. In fact the name "operation" is never mentioned but instead implied.

: : Dear Marcos,
: : Unless you are an ex patent examiner, the chances of your writing a worthwhile patent are just about as good as if you go to a scam artist. The difference is that your main cost is your time.
: : That is why we have the Reality Check®.

: : M. Arthur Auslander
: : Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
: : 3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463
: : 7185430266, aus@auslander.com
: : ELAINE's Workshop®
: : E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™
: : Reality Check®

Dear in the know,
There is on thing getting a patent and another getting a patent with broad claims, the can't be avoided and that will stand up in court.
I'm not intimidating inventors, I'm trying to keep them from the scams the false hopes of self doing.
As I have mentioned. Jerry Lemelson use to write his own application but made is 240M after using proper help.
M. Arthur Auslander
Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
3008 Johnson Ave., New York, NY 10463
7185430266, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop®
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive™
Reality Check®


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject: Re: Re: Re: Re: Description+operation

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

Do not disclose any details of any patent idea. See a lawyer.
Before you post a message you must agree to the Terms of Use.


This is the Old Patent Forum. It is no longer operational.
Click Here to go to the New Forums.


Pages: 1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  104  105  106  107  108  109  110 

www.intelproplaw.com The Intellectual Property Law Server

Old Patent Forum
www.intelproplaw.com