Re: US Examination

Posted by M Arthur Auslander on March 29, 2002 at 08:10:06:

In Reply to: US Examination posted by David on March 29, 2002 at 04:19:05:

: If Company A has an earlier priority date to company B and the technology is without question the same then why would an examiner allow both patents in the US of company A and B bearing in mind company A has an earlier priority date?

Dear David,
You may be starting with legal or factual conclusions that are wrong. The examiner may not be aware. The examiner may feel that an interference is the way of settling the problem.

That is why there are lawyers and that is why they make money too, if they have the clients to pay.

M. Arthur Auslander

Auslander & Thomas-Intellectual Property Law Since 1909
505 Eighth Avenue, New York, NY 10018
212-594-6900, fax 212-244-0028, aus@auslander.com
ELAINE's Workshop®
E arly L egal A dvice I s N ot E xpensive(sm)

Follow Ups:

• Re: Re: US Examination David 15:49:33 3/29/02 (6)
  • Re: Re: Re: US Examination M Arthur Auslander 22:20:28 3/29/02 (5)
    • Re: Re: Re: Re: US Examination David 03:33:34 3/30/02 (4)
      • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: US Examination M Arthur Auslander 03:58:04 3/30/02 (3)
        • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: US Examination David 14:52:08 3/31/02 (2)
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: US Examination M Arthur Auslander 22:06:04 3/31/02 (0)
          • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: US Examination M 21:59:39 3/31/02 (0)

Post a Followup